Answer:
No, he doesn't show diminishing marginal utility. Yes, he shows increasing marginal utility for Coke.
Explanation:
The law of diminishing returns states that the marginal or addition satisfaction or utility derived from the consumption of a product increase until a pint and then starts to decrease.
Units Total utility Marginal utility
1 10 10
2 25 15
3 50 25
After 3 bottles, John does not show diminishing marginal utility as the marginal utility (as shown above) continues to increase with each additional bottle of coke consumed.
Answer: -$500,000,000
Explanation:
The Balance of payment is an account that shows the difference between the money coming into a country as a result of transactions with other nations and money going out for the same reason.
Given the figures in the question, the Balance of Payments is;
= Current Account balance + Nonreserve financial account balance
= -1,000,000,000 + 500,000,000
= -$500,000,000
Answer and Explanation:
Respected Sir,
Sub: Absorption costing to analyze product costs and subsequent cost-volume-profit decisions
As per your requirement please find the explanation below:
Absorption costing is a process by which we add part of the fixed overhead to the production expense of the goods. If we do on a per-unit basis. Here we will compute by dividing the fixed costs by the number of units that we built and sold over the era. Whereas Variable costing includes fixed overhead as a lump sum instead of a per-unit price.
Under this process, all your variable costs like equipment, raw materials, and shipping are included. We will add the maximum fixed overhead costs for the duration. Such costs are not calculated on a per-unit basis. Rather than we deduct them as a lump-sum expense from your income amount.
Variable costing is really useful as it reveals the earnings after all the expenses are paid for the accounting period. While you would not have earned revenue for the goods we purchased as some may be in the inventory, we are showing you have paid all of your expenses for the time. We have excess revenue when you actually sell the finished goods in the warehouse.
The absorption approach is not all that effective as absorption costing will inflate the income figures excessively in any given span of accounting. Since you're not going to subtract any of your fixed costs as we did not sell any of us produced goods, our profit and loss report doesn't reflect the maximum expenses you've had for the time. Therefore, these results may mislead us when our profitability is analyzed.
Regards
ABC
Answer:
C. Joint Venture
Explanation:
A Joint Venture is a business agreement in which two or more parties agree to combine their resources in order to achieve an objective.
Companies use Joint Ventures to partner with foreign businesses in order to enter their market. This is what China is proposing in the scenario above, and it has been done in order that China might have a stake in those businesses.
<u>Advantages of a Joint Venture include:</u>
- Access to new markets.
- Pooling of resources.
- Low cost of production.
- Access to expertise ans technology, and so on.
Answer:
Option A
Explanation:
In simple words, Regardless of the expense of making guitars, the technique reduces the total cost of manufacturing a instrument. Phoenix would be in the production business of instruments, not pickups.
The target of this technique is therefore the entire guitar, not really the pickups. The smaller the process of manufacturing their instruments, the better manoeuvrability they have on the market. When they have reduced costs, they may change rates downwards in order to capture further market penetration.
