Answer:
Association Fallacy
Explanation:
Sarah has "fallen prey" of an <u>association fallacy</u>. A very common error in our society. The association fallacy is a logical one, and it means, in simple words, that someone assumes that one person belongs to a certain group by simply looking at the other person´s appearance.
For example: Besides the very good example given in the question there are thousands or million of other situations in which we can see this happens: people often categorize other´s by their <em>looks</em>, <em>hairstyles</em>, <em>piercings</em>, <em>skin color</em>, <em>clothes</em>, <em>accent</em>, etc.
Sarah, i would think, was prey of the most common falacies of all: the <u>association falacy</u>.
I would say the death penalty.
Answer: knowing that he can get something he likes equally by buying the burrito because it is cheaper than a hot dog, so he doesn't have to spend more on hotdogs because he can buy a burrito for cheaper.
Explanation:
The time of the Gupta empire was known as a golden age, where <span>peace and prosperity enabled them to pursue scientific and artistic advancements.</span>
The answer to this question is <span>compose yourselves!
In the chain rule topics, usually we're required to express derivative from a certain composition within a function.
The phrase 'compose' yourselves in this context is word play that touch two meaning of the words compose in this matter.</span>