Global interdependence first emerge during the world war and Revolution Periods.
Global interdependence refer to a condition in which a country is heavily dependent to another country for the continuation of their country ( such as military dependence, resources dependence, etc)
For the rights of an employee to exist, they must be contained in a formal employment contract that the employee has signed.
Answer: Option B
<u>Explanation:</u>
When the employee is appointed in a particular company for a post, the employer makes a contract signed by the employee. In that contract all the terms and the conditions are given on which the employee and the employer have agreed upon.
This contract gives the rights of the employee also that he will enjoy while working and being in a written form, the rights of the employee are always secure. This gives the job security to the employee through that contract.
1. Founded
2. Devoted
3. Benefited
4. Eventually
5. Transform
6. Innovation
Homo erectus and Neanderthals lived at the same time as homo sapiens. Neanderthals eventually died off and homo erectus may have evolved into homo sapiens
Answer: A. designating an anti-charity should be more effective because loss aversion will provide additional motivation
.
Options:
A. designating an anti-charity should be more effective because loss
aversion will provide additional motivation
B. designating a charity should be more effective because it avoids all potential for loss
C. it shouldn’t matter whether one designates a charity or anti-charity
D. self-interest biases generally keep people from choosing the anti-charity
Explanation:
The study of behavioral Economics shows that people are more driven by the loss of fear than the hope of gain. This is known as loss aversion. In commitment contracts where penalty money is promised to a charity or an anti-charity if the goal is not achieved, those who promise their money to an anti-charity tend to achieve their goals more. The same also applies when comparing this group and those who do not have to forego anything if they do not meet their target.
This is because giving to a charity will still seem beneficial while losing the money to an anti-charity will seem like a total loss.