Answer:
I think he can not . I believe that it has nothing to do that if for example Bailey had a car insurance with Progressive, which means it is supposed to provide additional insurance when they are injured by someone who does not have adequate insurance to cover the full damages. Bailey was negligent In the car accident. Bailey had failed to apply his brakes in time to avoid the collision, failed to turn his vehicle to avoid the collision, failed to keep his vehicle under control, and was inattentive to his surroundings.
Explanation:
Answer:
if you’re asking if that’s is cross contamination then your answer is yes
Explanation:
Answer:
1. 2) Fishermen report low catch of species for eating.
Fishermen will first report that they were unable to catch much fish.
2. 3) Public hearings are held to determine all the possible solutions.
There will then be a public hearing where the possible reasons and solutions to the fish problem are discussed.
3. 4)Marine scientists count fish population.
As part of the solution, marine scientists will count the populations of fish in the water.
4. 5)The Department of Fish and Game evaluates the repopulation of fisheries.
Based on this count, the Department of Fish and Game will research to find out how they can repopulate the water bodies.
5. Department of Fish and Game sets limits for fishermen.
As a result of this research, the Department will come up with a limit on the amount of fish that can be caught in a particular period to enable to fish population to rise to a certain level again.
First of all, none of that is even scientifically possibly, so you won't even come close to pushing people into a tv or a CRT, EVER in your ENTIRE LIFE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The criteria that law must meet in order to pass the government’s strict scrutiny test to reasonably discriminate includes"
- It must further a compelling government interest
- It must use the least restrictive means to achieve its purpose.
<h3>What is a
strict scrutiny test?</h3>
In law, a strict scrutiny refers to the highest standard of review which a court will use to evaluate the constitutionality of governmental discrimination. In order for a law to pass strict scrutiny, the legislature must have passed the law to further a "compelling governmental interest" and must have narrowly tailored the law to achieve that interest.
This standard is the highest and most of the stringent standard of judicial review and is part of the levels of judicial scrutiny that courts use to determine whether a constitutional right or principle should give way to the government's interest against observance of the principle. However, the lesser standards are rational basis review and exacting or intermediate scrutiny and these standards are applied to statutes and government action at all levels of government within the United States.
Read more about strict scrutiny
brainly.com/question/14671704
#SPJ1
