The ethics trap that is faced here would be contemplating to accept the reallocation because rejecting it may mean trouble and even lead to a lose of our jobs.
<h3>What is meant by ethical trap?</h3>
This is the term that has to do with the circumstances that may lead an individual to do away with the core values and the principles that they have. The trap here is that I may lose my job or may not have any bonus but accepting is going against the ethics and the values that I may hold special.
What should have been in this situation would have been to come clean in the first place so as to avoid going against ethics and the principles of the profession. The best way to do this would be to go to the head of division and explain the situation at hand to him.
Hence we can say that The ethics trap that is faced here would be contemplating to accept the reallocation because rejecting it may mean trouble and even lead to a lose of our jobs.
Read more on ethics here:
brainly.com/question/13969108
#SPJ1
Answer:
goods, common, predominant-factor
Explanation:
Article 2 of the UCC deals with the sale of <u>GOODS</u>. It does not deal with real property (real estate), services, or property such as stocks and bonds. Thus, if the subject matter of a dispute is goods, the UCC governs. If it is real estate or services, the <u>COMMON </u>law applies. If a contract involves both goods and services, the courts generally use the <u>PREDOMINANT-FACTOR </u>test to determine whether to apply the UCC
Insurance is a coverage that assesses the risk of a certain item/person. If that item/person is in good condition, your insurance will be lower because it's less likely it'll get damaged.
This is why if you have a bad driving history, your car insurance is high (as there is a high risk).
If you were to instal an alarm, live in a safe neighbourhood or choose not to install a swimming pool you would actually reduce your insurance.
If you have an alarm, you are less likely to have stuff stolen (safer = less risk).
Living in a safe neighbourhood is safer = less risk.
Not installing a pool means your property remains the same value (putting a pool could increase it), higher risk of someone drowning in the pool, or hurting themselves. So by not building the pool, you'll have a safer environment = less risk.
If you build your house in a floodplain, the chance of your house getting damages by a flood is very very high, so you will have to pay more as there is an increased risk.
Answer:
huh i dont understand that question no choosing letter
Answer: A. Push strategy
Explanation: A push strategy is where a company wants to ‘push’ a product on the consumers. In context, the potential buyers have yet to know the product exists so it is reasonable to push it on to the buyers. The other 3 options do not make sense as well.
