Answer:
(B) Mark has a $3,000 capital loss deduction.
Explanation:
Based on the tax bracket proposed, we deteminate the 7,000 is a short-term gain
and the second a long term gain.
First we must offset short capital losses against short capital gains:
7,000 - 18,000 = 11,000 short-term loss
now we offset against long term, if it is gain it will be long term gain if loss short term loss:
6,000 - 11,000 = 5,000 short-term loss
Okay we end up with a total loss of 5,000 but; <u>we have a cap at 3,000 </u> . So that is all Mark can claim as a deduction in other categories against wages and salaries or to carry foward over next period
The US internal revenue service taxes the taxable income of corporations as well as the taxable investment income of the firms’ shareholders' double taxation of dividends.
Revenue is the entire quantity of income generated by means of the sale of products or services related to the organization's number one operations. Revenue, additionally known as gross income, is regularly known as the "top line" as it sits at the pinnacle of the income declaration. Profits, or net earnings, are an agency's general profits or income.
In accounting, revenue is the entire quantity of profits generated by using the sale of goods and services related to the primary operations of the business. commercial sales will also be known as income or as turnover. Some corporations get hold of sales from interest, royalties, or different expenses.
Whilst comparing sales vs income you have to understand that “sales” refers to the total amount of cash a company generates before getting rid of any fees. “income”, then again, is equal to sales minus the fees of doing commercial enterprise, which include depreciation, hobby, taxes, and other expenses.
Learn more about revenue here brainly.com/question/16232387
#SPJ4
I think the answer is false
:):):):):):):)
Answer:
Explanation:
I will give a basic hint to understanding this problem
Prevailing technique or what is best known as "Dominant Strategy" is an activity profile that is best for a specific player review of what different players are picking. for this situation there is no prevailing procedure for any player on the grounds that there is no single activity profile that expands the result for any player.
So we can say from this observations that the following is valid;
- A doesn't have a dominant strategy
- B doesn't have a dominant strategy
There are two Nash equilibria for this situation. Both the organizations are charging a low cost and both the organizations are charging a significant expense.
As such they can augment their benefit given what the adversary is doing.
I hope this explains the observation seen.
cheers I hope this helps
