Answer:
It is not advisable to buy the food truck, since over the 4 years of investment it will show a loss of $ 40,000.
Explanation:
Since Eat at State is considering buying a new food truck, and it will cost $ 65,000, but is expected to generate $ 20,000 in sales over the next 4 years, and at the end of the 4th year, the truck will be sold to Eat Like a Wolverine in Ann Arbor for $ 10,000 (after taxes), and it will require $ 5,000 in additional Net Working capital that will not be recovered when the truck is sold, and the Dean of Food Services will only authorize the purchase if it is cash positive by the end of the 4th year, to determine, using the payback period method if the truck should be purchased and why, the following calculation must be performed:
-65,000 + 20,000 + 10,000 - 5,000 = X
-70,000 + 30,000 = X
-40,000 = X
Therefore, it is not advisable to buy the food truck, since over the 4 years of investment it will show a loss of $ 40,000.
Answer:
$1,067 is the correct answer.
Explanation:
Answer:
The correct word for the blank space is: callable.
Explanation:
A Callable Provision -typically referred when talking about bonds- is one that can be paid back to the issuer partially or in full before its maturity date. This provision allows the financial instrument issuer to replace higher than market instruments with ones lower.
Partner compatibility which captures the cultural fit between different firms, is one key element needed when selecting an alliance partner.
Value creation through alliances requires the simultaneous pursuit of companions with similar traits on certain dimensions and extraordinary traits on other dimensions. Partnering firms need to have distinctive aid and functionality profiles yet percentage similarities of their social establishments. In this text, the authors empirically have a look at the impact of companion traits on the overall performance of alliances. specifically, they check hypotheses associated with both direct effect of associate characteristics on alliance performance and oblique effects through relational capital aspects of the alliance. Empirical effects based totally on a pattern of alliances within the global creation contracting industry advocate that complementarity in accomplice sources and compatibility in cultural and operational norms have distinctive direct and indirect results on alliance performance. Accordingly, organizational routines geared toward companion choice want to be complemented via relationship management routines to maximize the capacity benefits from an alliance.
Learn more about Partner compatibility here:-
brainly.com/question/25012970
#SPJ4
Answer:
passive aggressive behavior
Explanation:
The behaviour Lorinda experienced between her manager and a sales rep was an example of passive aggressive behaviour because such behaviour is usually characterised by passive aggression rather than direct aggression which can be physical scuffles but rather shown by shouting, or any other ways of showing aggression without being physical.
Such people that have this type of behaviour are usually bitter and hostile when others make requests.
Such people can sabotage an operation intentionally because they are aggrieved
intentionally delaying or making mistakes when dealing with other peoples' requests.
They are also cynical or pessimistic.
They also don't feel appreciated anfand make complains about it most of the time
frequently complaining about feeling underappreciated or deceived
