Answer:
Anthony most likely concludes her speech in this manner because she hopes to <em><u>convince the audience that women are entitled to the same rights as men.</u></em>
Explanation:
It can be seen in this passage, Anthony was trying to protect women's right by implying that they are also citizens and their privileges and immunities should not be curtailed by any laws. And in the conclusion, she did also mention the term "discrimination against women" (refers to any actions that refuse opportunities, privileges to a person (or a group) because of gender as female) and express the objection to that to show the advocacy for women's right.
Some countries are developed and some are still developing
-Ming Dynasty.
-Zhu Yuanzhang's army eliminates the military forces of the Yuan Dynasty.
-Zhu declares himself the emperor of China.
-Construction on the Great Wall of China begins.
-Maritime trade is banned in China.
-Construction begins on the Forbidden City.
-The fourth Chinese domination of Vietnam begins.
The approach to leadership that most accurately describes Sergio's belief about his leadership skills is Charismatic Leadership.
<h3>What is the Charismatic Leadership style?</h3>
The charismatic leadership style is grounded on the following foundations:
- Personal charm
- Communication skills
- Persuasiveness
- Confidence
- Creativity
- Inspiration
- Idealized influence
The charismatic leadership style creates an emotional appeal with great social impact.
Thus, the approach to leadership that most accurately describes Sergio's belief about his leadership skills is Charismatic Leadership.
Learn more about Charismatic Leadership at brainly.com/question/14034988
#SPJ12
Answer: Constitutional, unconstitutional.
Explanation:
In Grutter v. Bollinger, the Supreme Court of the United States judged that the student admissions process can constitutionally favor underrepresented minority groups as long as race is not the only factor considered.
Gratz v. Bollinger ruled a points-based admissions policy that granted bonus points to minority applicants, unconstitutional since it was breaking the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment.
