Answer:
5000 at 6%
6000 at 11%
Explanation:
Given that :
Total principal = 10000
Let :
Principal invested in business A = x
Principal invested in business B = y
Interest = Principal * rate * time
(x * 6% * 1) + (y * 11% * 1) = 900
0.06x + 0.11y = 900 - - - - (1)
x + y = 10000 - - - (2)
From (2)
x = 10000 - y
Put x = 10000 - y in (1)
0.06(10000 - y) + 0.11y = 900
600 - 0.06y + 0.11y = 900
600 + 0.05y = 900
0.05y = 900 - 600
0.05y = 300
y = 300 / 0.05
y = 6000
x = 10000 - y
x = 10000 - 6000
x = 5000
Answer:
Meyers Corporation
Determining the amount of cash flows:
a. $60,000
b. -$45,000
c. -$1,500
d. $6,000
e. -$10,000
f. -$5,000
Classification as operating, investing, or financing activities:
a. Financing
b. Investing
c. Operating
d. Operating
e. Operating
f. Financing
Explanation:
Meyers Corporation prepares the statement of cash flows which classifies its financial activities into three main sections: operating activities, investing activities, and financing activities sections in order to present the statement in clear and understandable formats. This statement is one of the main financial statements that report the corporation's financial position and performance at the end of an accounting period.
Answer:
The introductory APR is the interest rate that the loan or credit card starts out at..(usually a promotional tool)and the standard rate is what the rate normally is.. the set rate
Explanation:
Answer:
1. 20 units
2. $600
Explanation:
1. 
MC = 4q
Price, P = $80
For maximizing profits,
Marginal cost = Price of the commodity
4q = 80
q = 20 units


= 200 + 800
= 1,000
2. Profit = Total revenue - Total cost
= (Price × Quantity) - TC
= (80 × 20) - $1,000
= $1,600 - $1,000
= $600
3. We know that the firm in the short run will be produce at a point where total revenue is greater than the total variable cost
Average variable cost = variable cost ÷ quantity

= 2Q
MC = 4Q
Here, MC is greater than AVC at any given point.
so in the short run firm will producing short run positive profit.
Answer (A):
Need more data to select the better adviser
<u>Explanation: </u>
Adviser A averaged 19% return on the investment which is more than that of Adviser B who averaged 16% return on investment. However, adviser A has a beta of 1.5 which is also greater than that of Adviser B who has a beta of 1. This means that adviser A made a more riskier investment and hence a higher average return on investment. We need more data to tell which adviser performed better in relation to each other.
Answer (B):
Investment Adviser B
<u>Explanation:</u>
= T-bill rate = 6%
= Market return = 14%
= Market risk premium = 14% - 6% = 8%
= Average Return by Adviser A =19%
= Beta of Adviser A = 1.5
= Average Return by Adviser B =16%
= Beta of Adviser B = 1
CAPM Equation is 
<u>For Adviser A</u>
= 6 + 1.5 (14 - 6) = 18%
The expected average return for the investment is 18% which means that Adviser A over performed the market by 1 %
<u>For Adviser B</u>
= 6 + 1 (14 - 6) = 14%
The expected average return for the investment is 14% which means that the Adviser B over performed the market by 2 %
Clearly, Adviser B performed better than Adviser A.
Answer (C):
Adviser B
<u>Explanation:</u>
<u />
In this part, the
and 
All else remains the same
We make similar calculation as in part B