Explanation:
Pair 1 is true if Jeff's monthly income is $600/20% = $3,000.
Pair 2 is true if Jeff's monthly income is $1200/10% = $12,000.
Both pairs can be true if Jeff's monthly income increased by a factor of 4 in the 20 years from 1990 to 2010.
Obviously, Jeff spent more on housing in 2010. (Fortunately for Jeff, that larger expenditure was a smaller fraction of his income.)
Here's a way to do it.
Let 4e +2 = 5n +1 . . . . . . for some integer n
Then e = (5n -1)/4 = n + (n -1)/4
We want (n-1)/4 to be an integer, so let it be integer m.
... m = (n -1)/4
... 4m = n -1
... 4m +1 = n
Substituting this into our expression for e gives
... e = (5(4m+1) -1)/4 = (20m +4)/4 = 5m +1
e = 5m+1 for any integer m
9514 1404 393
Answer:
D) No Solutions
Step-by-step explanation:
The lines have the same slope (-4), but different y-intercepts (3, 0), so they are parallel lines. There can be no values of x and y that satisfy both equations.
There are no solutions.
28:13 is the answer i’m pretty for sure
He spent $36 on safety equipment.
The total cost each time was $11, meaning he had to pay 9 times for each skate session. 4x9=36! ( 7x9= 63 so if you add 36 you'll get 99 just as a way of checking)
Do you watch/read pandora hearts?
