Answer:
Surface area = 80.4 cm²
Step-by-step explanation:
The diagram of both cylinders is attached below for a better understanding.
<h3>First find the radius of larger cylinder:</h3>
Surface area = 2πrh + 2πr²
236 = 2(3.14)(5)r + 2(3.14)r²
236 = 31.4r + 6.28r²
236 = 6.28(r² + 5r)
35.58 = r² + 5r
r = 3.97 cm
<h3>
Find the radius of Smaller cylinder:</h3>
Two cylinders are in proportion if their heights and radius are in proportion:
Ratio of height of small cylinder to big cylinder = 3/5 = 0.6
So ratio of radius of both is also 0.6
Let R be the radius of small cylinder
ratio of radius of small cylinder to big cylinder = R / 3.97
R = (0.6)(3.97)
R = 2.38
<h3 /><h3>Surface Area for small cylinder:</h3>
R = 2.38cm and h = 3 cm
Surface area = 2πrh + 2πr²
Surface area = 2(3.14)(2.38)(3) + 2(3.14)(2.38)²
Surface area = 80.4115cm²
Round of to nearest tenth
Surface area = 80.4 cm²
Answer:
x^2
Step-by-step explanation:
So there's very two obvious ones we can elimination immediately, that's f(x) = x, and f(x) = |x|. The reason for this is because we can just look at the first ordered pair of (-2, 4). If it was f(x) = x, then the ordered pair would be (-2, -2), but it isn't. Very similar reasoning for f(x) = |x|, except for this function each ordered pair should have the same magnitude or absolute value. So the f(-2) should output 2, since it's the absolute value, but of course this isn't the case since it's 4.
So let's look at 2^x
Since the y value is 4 and not 1/4, this is not the parent function
It should be the second option (x^2), and we can double check
(-2)^2 = 4
(-1)^2 = 1
(0)^2 = 0
(1)^2 = 1
(2)^2 = 4
It outputs the same y-values as the table so this is the parent function
X - the length of the model:
36.25 : 9 = x : 1.25
9 x = 36.25 · 1.25
9 x = 45.3125
x = 5.03 ≈ 5 inches.
I need to see the entire graph to answer this.
Answer:
a) 103, b) No
Step-by-step explanation:
a) We need to multiply the probability by the amount of the sample to get:
200 × 51.6% = 103.2, rounded down to 103
b) As we have selected the people randomly, we have no control over the type of people we are given - this is theoretical and the estimate is not definite - all of the sample could have murdered by firearm or even none (even though it is highly unlikely).
