The correct answer for this question is b. the claim
When evaluating an argument follow these steps:
-Determine the claim:
-Identify reasons
-Locate evidence
-Analyze evidence
It's equivalent because no matter how much you add 0's it would be the same answer
Question 1:
Humorous passage 1: "It (the umbrella) was made to be carried on the arm like an enormous ornamental bat and to allow one the opportunity to put on British airs as the atmospheric conditions demanded."
Humorous passage 2: "(The umbrella is) An item to be carried in the street, to be used to startle friends and—in the worst of cases—to fend off one’s creditors."
Question 2:
Passage 1 is funny because it compares the umbrella to an ornamental bat, which sounds weird in the first place. Plus, the umbrellas is said to be used by people who want to seem British, which is even more outrageously funny.
Passage 2 is funny because it treats the umbrella as a scary object which can be used even to fend off people you owe money to, which is absurd.
In both passages, the author uses tone and voice in a very witty way: he speaks seriously about absurdity, about unimaginable stuff. It is like an encyclopedia of weird and fun facts. That is what makes it funny: the contrast between a serious tone and larger than life images.
Answer:
The answer is to analyse
Explanation:
The deffinition of analyse is to separate a whole into its parts and then look more closely at those parts.
Well anne Frank lived in Amsterdam Holland so you could do that
