The missing justification in Julia's angle proof is; Corresponding Angles Theorem
<h3>What is the angle theorem used?</h3>
We know that m∠AGE ≅ m∠HGB because they have congruent angles and are vertical angles.
Similarly, m∠HGB ≅ m∠CHE are alternate interior angles because two congruent angles on the inner side of the parallel lines are formed by a transversal.
In the diagram, m∠AGE ≅ m∠CHE would have to be corresponding Angles Theorem because parallel lines cut by a transversal would create congruent corresponding angles. That means a pair of angles on the same side of one of two lines that is cut by a transversal and on the same side of the transversal.
Read more about Angle theorem at; brainly.com/question/24839702
#SPJ1
B. 4.5=2m+g
f. 9.25=3m+2g
1.25=m
sub
b. 4.5=2(1.25)+g
f. 9.25=3(1.25)+2g
b. 4.5=2.5+g
f. 9.25=3.75+2g
minus 2.5 from both sides on the b. equaion and minus 3.75 from both sides on the f. equation
b. 2=g
f. 5.5=2g
divide both sides of f. equation by 2
b. 2=g
f. 2.75=g
2.75-2=0.75
finn paied $0.75 more for a bag of grapes
whatttttttt? i have no idea what that is
Answer:
La cantidad de dinero
Celia tiene = x = 9.33 €
Quique tiene = y = 4.67 €
Step-by-step explanation:
Representemos la cantidad de dinero
Celia tiene = x
Quique tiene = y
Entre Celia y Quique suman 14 €.
x + y = 14
x = 14 - y
Si Celia tuviera 1 euro, tendría el doble de dinero que Quique.
Por lo tanto,
x = 2 años
Nosotros sustituimos
2y + y = 14
3 años = 14
y = 14/3
y = 4.67 €
x = 14 € - y
x = 14 € - 4.67 €
x = 9.33 €
Por lo tanto,
La cantidad de dinero
Celia tiene = x = 9.33 €
Quique tiene = y = 4.67 €
Answer:
hello i used this website called math-way and found the answer
x
=
−
3
