This equation can be solved graphically by plotting the equations
f(x) = 3^x
and
g(x) = 5x-1.
The x-coordinate of the point(s) of intersection is the solution.
_____
On my graphing calculator, I find it easier to locate x-intercepts, so I would rewrite the equation as
3^x -(5x -1) = 0
and plot the function
h(x) = 3^x -(5x -1)
The x-intercept(s) would be the solutions. (There are two: x≈0.577, x=2.)
Answer:
no
Step-by-step explanation:
i cant be simplified
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Yes, it is a line of slope 1.
<span>
<u><em>The correct answer is: </em></u>C) his solution for x is correct, but in order for 6 to be an extraneous solution, one denominator has to result in 0 when 6 is substituted for x.
<u><em>Explanation: </em></u><span><u>To solve this rational equation, we cross multiply: </u>
8*(x-4)=2*(x+2).
<u>Using the distributive property, we have </u>
8*x-8*4=2*x+2*2;
8x-32=2x+4.
<u>Subtract 2x from each side: </u>
8x-32-2x=2x+4-2x;
6x-32=4.
<u>Add 32 to each side: </u>
6x-32+32=4+32;
6x=36.
<u>Divide both sides by 6:</u>
</span></span>
<span><span>=</span></span>
<span><span>;
x=6.
<u>Extraneous solutions</u> are solutions that come about in the problem but are not valid solutions to the problem; the only values of x that would give this sort of answer are -2 and 4, since these are the two values that would make one of the denominators 0 (we cannot divide by 0).</span></span>
So let us analyze the given table above. In the first tax bracket, he doesn't have to pay tax on the dividends. The $565 he earned in dividends is not taxable as well. Also the common stock he bought for $705 since this is a long term evidence. So the only taxable would be <span>$780 in coupons on a corporate bond. So multiply this by 10% and you get $78. Therefore, the answer would be the first option. Hope this helps.</span>
