1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Charra [1.4K]
3 years ago
11

What percentage of people die without a will

Social Studies
2 answers:
Damm [24]3 years ago
7 0
Over 70 percent of people die without a will
mars1129 [50]3 years ago
4 0
Hey there,

Answer:

More than 70% of the people die without a will

Hope this helps :D

<em>~Top♥</em>
You might be interested in
A disclaimer of an implied warranty of fitness must be in writing.<br> a. true<br> b. false
Daniel [21]
B is the answer that is theimplication to your answer
6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
PLEASE ANSWER FAST!!
Setler79 [48]

Answer:

Forgiveness is impossible. This was the thought of the philosopher Jacques Derrida, and he has a good point.

There are some things that we say are easy to forgive. But, Derrida argues, they don't actually need forgiving. I forget to reply to an email, and my friend remarks: "Oh, it didn't really matter anyway." It's not that he forgave me. He'd forgotten about the email too.Then, there are other things we say are hard to forgive, and we admire those who appear to be able to forgive nonetheless. The case of Rais Bhuiyan, who was shot by Mark Stroman, is a case in point. Bhuiyan says he forgave Stroman, and asked the Texas authorities not to execute him for his crime. But did Bhuiyan really forgive?

He writes of how Stroman was ignorant and had a terrible upbringing. He had seen signs that Stroman was now a changed man. So, it does not seem that Bhuiyan forgave his assailant. Rather, he came to understand him. He saw the crime from the perpetrator's point of view. There were reasons for the wrongdoing. That lets Stroman off the hook. It's not really forgiveness.

CS Lewis wrote: "Everyone says forgiveness is a lovely idea, until they have something to forgive." Which is again to imply that those who think they have offered forgiveness really find they don't have anything to forgive after all.The ancient philosophers appear to have thought that forgiveness is something of a pseudo-subject, too. They hardly touched on it, for all that they dwelt on all manner of other moral concerns. It is not on any list of virtues.

Take Aristotle. He wrote about pardoning people, but only when they are not responsible. "There is pardon," he says, "whenever someone does a wrong action because of conditions of a sort that overstrain human nature, and that no one would endure." When nature has not been overstrained, justice must meet wrongdoing. Forgiveness doesn't come into it.

All this calls into question a theory in evolutionary psychology. Here, the argument is that forgiveness is essential to our evolutionary success.It's because we forgive one another that we are able to live in large groups. People in collectives like cities are bound to offend one another all the time, the theory goes. It's because we are so ready to forgive and continue to co-operate that we don't, as a rule, destroy ourselves in spirals of retribution.

But I'm not sure that's right. Evolutionary doctrine itself undermines our capacity to forgive. Rather, it teaches that we learn it's in our own self-interest to co-operate. We put up with others because, at some deep level, we know we serve ourselves in so doing. That's not forgiveness.

Surely, you might be thinking, Christianity teaches forgiveness, a forgiveness that is real. But once more, that can be challenged. Take the parable of the prodigal son. You may half remember it as the paradigmatic tale of forgiveness, the father forgiving the son in spite of his profligacy. But read it again. Forgiveness is not once mentioned. The son does not ask for it. The father does not offer it. Rather, when the son returns, the father spontaneously throws a party

5 0
2 years ago
An employer liable for a physical tort committed by an employee acting within the scope of his employment under the theory of .
dolphi86 [110]

Answer:

Respondeat superieor

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What were the reformers of the Anglican Church called?
Harlamova29_29 [7]
Archbishop of Canterbury
4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Name four line-of-sight and two path-of-travel restrictions you may encounter at an uncontrolled intersection.
sattari [20]

Answer:

Explanation:

Line of sight is the visible path between your vehicle and the target area.

Line of sight problems include

  • Bushes
  • Parked cars
  • fences
  • Trees

While Path of travel includes

  • Snow
  • Ice
  • Construction, etc.
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Georgia entrepreneur Ted Turner found success by turning his father's advertising firm into
    5·2 answers
  • What is the difference between a natural and a political boundary
    11·2 answers
  • Unreliable generalizations about all members of a group that do not take individual differences into account are known as ______
    11·1 answer
  • When city dwellers fail to respond to ordinary traffic sounds, it is an example of:?
    13·1 answer
  • According to freud, _____ is the primary defense mechanism.
    11·1 answer
  • High self-esteem has not been linked to aggressive behavior T/F
    15·2 answers
  • Why did people begin to dislike the Republican Party During the Reconstruction? How did that affect their control over the gover
    9·1 answer
  • Explain how the energy changes in a swinging pendulum from potential to kinetic and back to potential
    14·1 answer
  • Based on Source 3 what possible political conflict could arise from implementing this constitution?
    11·2 answers
  • Why is every young person in america watching the sopranos
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!