The correct answer to this open question is the following.
The way in that Mesopotamian culture influenced the Hebrews, Israelites, and Jews was the following.
Father Abraham, the patriarch of the ancient Hebrew people, was from the city-state of Ur, an ancient Sumerian city-state, that was one of the most important in the Mesopotamian times, as well as the city-states of Uruk, Lagash, Nippur or Eridu. Abraham's family worshiped the Mesopotamian Gods, but Abraham believed in one God. That is why he decided to leave Ur with his wife Sarah. He believed that this one god he believed in, had promised the Hebrews a special land for them, and that is when they settled in Canaan, modern-day Jewish territory, close to Judah. That is why Hebrews are also known as Jewish.
Answer: A. The abolitionist movement grew stronger.
<em>Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857)</em> was a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court. It held that black people whose ancestors were imported into the U.S., whether enslaved of free, could not be American citizens. Therefore, they could not sue in federal court. Moreover, it ruled that the federal government had no power to regulate slavery in the territories acquired after the creation of the United States.
The decision was controversial, and greatly opposed by abolitionist groups. It strengthened the abolitionist movement and may have been a catalyst for the American Civil War.
Rural Americans were much more self-sufficient than Urban Americans. They had farms or often went hunting or similar things and didn't rely that much on money and getting manufactured goods or store-bought food. Urban Americans however had other opportunities such as higher chance of chasing their careers or educating themselves or participating in daily life and political events and similar things.
The French citizens stormed the Bastille in 1789 looking for arms and ammunition they believed to be hidden there. They also hoped to free political prisoners that they believed were kept there.
Community corrections officials in South Africa face several problems when monitoring offenders in communities such as:
- Lack of manpower
- Lying by community members
- Danger to correctio official
Community correction officials are tasked with monitoring offenders who were not put in jail by the Court but were instead ordered to serve their sentence in communities by doing certain things.
In South Africa, some challenges these officials might face include:
- Lack of manpower - because of high crime rates in South Africa, corrections officials may be assigned to too many offenders which would reduce the effectiveness of their monitoring.
- Lies by community members - members of the community might lie to protect offenders when they commit fresh crimes or fail to do what the courts instructed them to do so that the offenders do not end up in jail.
- Danger to correction official - South Africa has seen its fair share of violence against law enforcement officials. Corrections officials going into the community to monitor offenders can therefore put them at risk of being harmed by criminals in the community.
In conclusion, community corrections programs might have certain advantages but they can present various challenges to officials.
<em>Find out more at brainly.com/question/3043600.</em>