A:line and a prism.
B:line and rectangle
Answer:
<h2>Kelly is wrong, with this congruent parts, we can conclude that triangles are congruent.</h2>
Step-by-step explanation:
To demonstrate congruent triangles, we need to use the proper postulates. There are at least 5 postulates we can use.
- Angle-Angle-Side Theorem (AAS theorem).
- Hypotenuse-Leg Theorem (HL theorem).
- Side-Side-Side Postulate (SSS postulate).
- Angle-Side-Angle Postulate (ASA postulate).
- Side-Angle-Side Postulate (SAS postulate).
In this case, Kelly SAS postulate, because the corresponding sides-angles-sides are congruent, i.e., KL ≅ MN and LM ≅ KN, also, all corresponding angles are congruent.
So, as you can see, only using SAS postulate, the congruency can be demonstrated. (Refer to the image attached to see an example of SAS postulate)
If you would like to write x = 1/3 * y in general form, you can do this using the following steps:
The general form of the equation is: ax + by + c = 0.
x = 1/3 * y
x - 1/3 * y = 0
The correct result would be x - 1/3 * y = 0.
Answer:
3.21
Step-by-step explanation:
got it from googIe
Answer:
x = 6, y = -2
Step-by-step explanation:
24/4 = 6
x = 6
= (5x6)+8y=14
= 8y = 14 -30
8y = -16
y = -16/8
y = -2
Check: 5x6+8x-2= 14