<span>The marginal propensity to consume is a metric
that quantifies the concept of increase in consumption with an increase in
income. Mathematically MPC is defined as:</span>
MPC = Change in consumption / Change in income
Purchase of goods and services is considered as
consumption, therefore:
Change in consumption = $16 billion
In the government’s perspective, taxes are
considered as income, therefore the problem ask us to find for the necessary change
in tax collection to maintain equilibrium GDP. Substituting the values in the
formula:
0.80 = $16 billion / Change in income
Change in income = $20 billion
<span>Therefore the government should increase the tax collection by $20
billion.</span>
Answer:
B. referent power is the correct answer.
Explanation:
- Referent power is the capability of a leader who has the power to influence and motivate followers.
- Referent power is power gained by those individuals who have influential and effective interpersonal relationships abilities.
- The advantage of referent power is that the referent leader has the ability to motivate and inspire the workers to be dedicated to their works.
Answer:
a) Qs = 50 + 20p - 7ps
= 50 + 20p - 7×(2)
= 50 + 20p - 14
= 36 + 20p
At equilibrium,
=
So, 150 - 10p + 5
= 36 + 20p
So, 20p + 10p = 30p
= 150 - 36 + 5
= 114 + 5
So, p = (114/30) + (5/30)
= 3.8 + 0.17
Thus,
= 3.8 + 0.17
Q = 36 + 20p
= 36 + 20(3.8 + 0.17
)
= 36 + 76 + 3.4
= 112 + 3.4
Thus,
= 112 + 3.4
b)
= 3.8 + 0.17
= 3.8 + 0.17×(5)
= 3.8 + .85
= 4.65
= 112 + 3.4
= 112 + 3.4(5)
= 112 + 17
= 129
c) Qd = 150 - 10p + 5pb = 150 - 10(2.5) + 5(5) = 150 - 25 + 25 = 150
Qs = 36 + 20p = 36 + 20(2.5) = 36 + 50 = 86
Thus, there is excess demand as
> 
d) New
= 180 - 10p + 5
= 180 - 10p + 5×(5)
= 180 - 10p + 25
= 205 - 10p
Now, new
=
gives,
205 - 10p = 36 + 20p
So, 20p + 10p = 205 - 36
So, 30p = 169
So, p = 169÷30
So,
= 5.63
Q = 205 - 10p = 205 - 10×(5.63) = 205 - 56.3 = 148.7
So,
= 148.7
Answer:
A. Decrease
Explanation:
In investment appraisal with the method of Net Present Value, the bone of contention and the central matter is the TIME VALUE OF MONEY.
In the above scenario, the initial working capital was 100% released in proportions of 40%, 40% and 20%, throughout the 3 years of the project. However, if the reverse had been the case, i.e. parting with more cash now and the requirement of working capital now becomes: Year 0 = -10,000, Year 1 = - 10,000, Year 2 = -10,000, Year 3 = +30,000; the NPV would definitely shrink because the value of 10,000 each in Years 0-2 would not be the same when it is recovered from the project in year 3. The value will be smaller and hence the NPV of the project would have decreased as a result of the time value of money.
Going out to buy things that she doesn't need in life<span />