Answer:
See below
Explanation:
A price increase motivates suppliers to avail more products for sale in the markets. High prices tend to have a high margin hence more profits. Like other businesses, oil producers are profit-motivated; they will supply more quantities if there is a high probability of making more profits.
The law of supply explains the correlation between supply and price. As prices increase, supply also tends to increase.
Answer: Option E
Explanation: It is a known fact that a consumer gets excited more while doing offline shopping rather than the online shopping. Offline shopping through malls and stores gives the consumer advantage of live appearance and trial use in case of clothes and other such merchandize.
However the long lines for billing and other such lengthy procedures make it difficult.
Hence from the above we can conclude that the correct option is E.
Explanation:
The following is contextual translation of the <em>English</em> sentences to Spanish sentences:
Question 1:
Un hombre sacando una bolsa de garaje de una lata en una cocina.
Question 2:
Una mujer en un dormitorio poner una hoja en una cama.
Question 3:
Un hombre de pie en una sala de estar aspirando una alfombra.
Question 4:
Una mujer en un estudio desempolva un escritorio con un paño.
Answer:
Your opportunity cost of attending a game compared with the opportunity cost facing a college student 10 years ago is:
A) higher, because more games are televised today.
Opportunity costs are the cost of choosing one alternative from another.
In this case, when college students attend college football games they are unable to do other activities, not only while they are at the stadium or going to the stadium, but they are not able to purchase other goods. The cost of those alternatives that are lost are higher now because many college football games are televised now, before if you wanted to see a game you had to go to the game. So a student is now able to watch the game while doing other activities, or saving money for buying something else.
Can this change in opportunity cost account for the decline in college football attendance?
B) Yes, because these changes increase the opportunity cost of watching football games in person.
Even though opportunity costs do not involve actual cash payments, they are still important and individuals do consider them when they are choose one option over another. E.g. imagine if you had to choose between spending a considerable amount of money by attending a game (ticket, gas, beverages, etc.) or watching that game on TV and buying a few clothes instead or going on a date, etc. What option would you choose?
The right answer is community settings :D