For Native Americans, land was not privately owned. Land was for common use of the tribe. Disputes over land were not between members of the same tribe. Often the land and territory disputes were between rival tribes in an certain area or region. Things like food collection and raising children were whole tribe activities, not solely up to the parents. Life was more communal.
Answer: The English (Britain)
Explanation: After Their Discoveries Britain Settled In The Colonies.
<span>He called it a reforming purge that was designed to help the
country. In reality, it was done to make room for his own party because
it was the spoil system in which the governmental positions would go to
party members, not to those who actually deserve it. During his first
term, he changed as much as 20% of government workers.</span>
It was Burgoyne's over confidence and there were to many several key tactical errors.
I left 2 website links under. Check them out.
1. It encourages international cooperation.
- true!
It
leads to peaceful resolutions of international
conflicts. - well, a bit, but only as an extension of the frist thing- so the frist one is a better option!
It protects fragile ecosystems. - nothing to do with that!
It provides jobs for workers
in developed nations. - not, rather in the developing nation
Which is an argument against free trade?
It can limit environmental protection measures. - i don't think this is a very good option, but its the best of those given. Let's say that one country prohibits production which is enviromentally harmful, but cheap: a free trade would challenge this deciosn.
It leads to
international conflict. - no, i don't think so
It increases the prices for many products. -no, it rather decreases
It
violates basic economic principles.
- no, i don't think si
