1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
swat32
3 years ago
5

Two arguments about a historical event contradict each other. How should historians determine which argument is superior? A. Pol

l people who live near the location where the historical event happened. B. Trust the argument made by the more educated, respected person. C. Search for additional evidence to see which argument it supports. D. Prefer the simpler argument to the more complex argument.
History
2 answers:
Black_prince [1.1K]3 years ago
8 0

The answer is C. If two arguments about a historical event contradict each other, historians should search for additional evidence to see wich argument it supports.

Historians' work must be based on evidence; when researching certain historical event, they examine primary sources, such as texts, documents, pictures, diaries, etc., from that time period, these documents are the evidence they interpret in order to formuate an argument about such event.

Oksanka [162]3 years ago
5 0
The answer would be C. Search for additional evidence to see which argument supports.
You might be interested in
Match each term with its correct definition
kati45 [8]

Answer:

Hey there!

Westernize= To adopt to the culture of Western European countries.

Ideal= Perfect example

Boyar= High ranking Russian nobility.

Amada= Fleet of warships

Divine right= belief that God created the monarchy to act as his representative.

Let me know if this helps :)

3 0
3 years ago
Which group was most likely to help a homeless and jobless person during the Great Depression? APEX
Ostrovityanka [42]

(C. Communist Party)

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The Whig Party, formed in 1834, supported
monitta
I think the answer is C.
6 0
3 years ago
How might the closing of the frontier have affected people in the United States? Write your answer in one or two sentences.
Kipish [7]

Frontier became a part of America's identity. It represented many things to Americans. Adventure, danger, freedom and opportunity represents the frontier. It is because of the end of the frontier, it had a psychological impact to Americans because the frontier became their sort of escape mechanism.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
If a president were to declare a “ hands off” policy, what do you think he might be describing
Mamont248 [21]

Answer:

Hands off policy would be described as the policy that means not intervening in matters.

If a president has announced an off hands policy in some matter, that means he has declared that he will not intervene in that matter under any circumstance. He would have nothing to do with it and nobody shall try to have him indulged in that matter.

I hope the answer was helpful.

Thanks for asking.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which goal was john muir most interested in
    10·2 answers
  • Background information: This is a journal entry from a soldier fighting on the western front.
    14·2 answers
  • How did the state government develop after the colonies gain independence
    13·2 answers
  • 3.
    9·1 answer
  • The total value of
    6·1 answer
  • What is the difference between paper currency and coins?
    7·1 answer
  • Is it true that native Americans hunt Buffalo for profit
    15·1 answer
  • La reproduccion es un conjunto de procesos de las que surge un individuo nuevo
    14·1 answer
  • The Bill of Rights guarantees all Americans certain freedoms, such as freedom of _________________, freedom of the _____________
    10·1 answer
  • 1 Which statement about general education policy is most accurate?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!