1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
swat32
3 years ago
5

Two arguments about a historical event contradict each other. How should historians determine which argument is superior? A. Pol

l people who live near the location where the historical event happened. B. Trust the argument made by the more educated, respected person. C. Search for additional evidence to see which argument it supports. D. Prefer the simpler argument to the more complex argument.
History
2 answers:
Black_prince [1.1K]3 years ago
8 0

The answer is C. If two arguments about a historical event contradict each other, historians should search for additional evidence to see wich argument it supports.

Historians' work must be based on evidence; when researching certain historical event, they examine primary sources, such as texts, documents, pictures, diaries, etc., from that time period, these documents are the evidence they interpret in order to formuate an argument about such event.

Oksanka [162]3 years ago
5 0
The answer would be C. Search for additional evidence to see which argument supports.
You might be interested in
Help plssss, I got stuck :(
Aleksandr [31]
I think the answer is D
4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
even though the war was technically fought in north and south korea, which two major countries really did most of the fighting?
Alina [70]

Answer:

United States and the Soviet Union.

Explanation:

The Soviet Union was trying to spread communism all over Korea. The United States joined in with South Korea to fight against the communist North Korea.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why was the soviet union unprepared for Hitler's attack on june 1941
Korvikt [17]
Because the soviets had previously signed a Non-Aggression pact with Germany and didn't expect the attack from Hitler (A.K.A Germany.)

Hoped this helped!
6 0
3 years ago
Why did African American political participation rise and then suddenly decrease
lana [24]
Because they are bretrayers an selfish people
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What does kinetic force mean?<br> (in a politic definition) :)
topjm [15]
In physics, the kinetic energy of an object is the energy that it possesses due to its motion. Our body maintains this kinetic energy unless it's speed changes. Hope this helps.. :)
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The table below compares two documents.
    9·2 answers
  • Which movement of African people was
    6·1 answer
  • Which of the following was not a result of Japan’s attack on Pearl Harbor?
    6·2 answers
  • In 1767, Parliament met to discuss
    10·2 answers
  • TIMED Why might the bulding of the Erie Canal be considered controversial?
    7·2 answers
  • Describe Art Deco in 3 adjectives<br><br> Describe Art Nouveau in 3 adjectives
    6·1 answer
  • How did the eastern question affect the austro hungrarian empire?
    14·1 answer
  • WORTH 100 POINTS!!!!!
    7·2 answers
  • Do you think the Voting Rights Act of 1965 was needed and was it stressful
    8·1 answer
  • How did new england settlers justify taking over indian land?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!