All categories

2 years ago

Estimate the number 78% of 112

Mathematics

2 answers:

andreyandreev [35.5K]2 years ago

4 0

I believe it is 87.36. You would take 78% and muiltply it by 112. I think. Hope I helped.

balu736 [363]2 years ago

3 0

To find 78% of 112

find 10% which is 11.2 (divide by 10)
find 70% by multiplying 11.2 by 7 which is 78.4
find 1% by dividing it by 100 which would give you 1.12
find 8% by multiplying 1.12 by 8 which would be 8.96
78% is 78.4 + 8.96 which is 87.36

ANSWER- 87.36

You might be interested in

fiona draws a 24 centimeter rectangle.gregory draws a 24 square inch rectangle.whose rectangle is in area .how do you know

Valentin [98]

Answer:

Therefore we come to a conclusion that,

Gregory's Rectangle is in Area.

Step-by-step explanation:

Given:

Fiona draws a 24 centimeter rectangle.

Gregory draws a 24 square inch rectangle.

To Find:

Whose rectangle is in area = ?

Solution:

Rectangle has a dimension as

Length and Width which are in meters, centimeters, inches, feet, units, etc.

For Area

$Area\ of\ Rectangle=Length\times Width$

here units are getting Multiplied so it becomes

unit × unit = unit² = square units

m × m = m² =square meter

inch × inch = inch² =square inches

Hence Area is calculated in square units.

Therefore we come to a conclusion that,

Gregory's Rectangle is in Area.

6 0

2 years ago

What is the total volume of the figure? Pls help

goldfiish [28.3K]

Answer: 58 in

Step-by-step explanation:

3 0

2 years ago

The number of tropical fish that an aquarium can hold depends on the volume of the fish tank. the interior dimensions of the fis

Stells [14]

<span>To figure the amount of tropical fish in the aquarium you multiple length*height*width to find the cubic centimeters of the tank, then divide that number by 10,000. 60*50*30=90,000 cubic centimeters. 90,000/10,000=9. 9 tropical fish could be places in a tank with those dimensions.</span>

3 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Consider the following proposed proof by contradiction that for all positive integers n, 3n > 2.

laila [671]

Answer:

The proof contains a simple direct proof, wrapped inside the unnecessary logical packaging of a proof by contradiction framework.

Step-by-step explanation:

The proof is rigourous and well written, so we discard the second answer.

This is not a fake proof by contradiction: it does not have any logical fallacies (circular arguments) or additional assumptions, like, for example, the "proof" of "All the horses are the same color". It is factually correct, but it can be rewritten as a direct proof.

A meaningful proof by contradiction depends strongly on the assumption that the statement to prove is false. In this argument, we only this assumption once, thus it is innecessary. Other proofs by contradiction, like the proof of "The square root of 2 is irrational" or Euclid's proof of the infinitude of primes, develop a longer argument based on the new assumption, but this proof doesn't.

To rewrite this without the superfluous framework, erase the parts "Suppose that the statement is false" and "The fact that the statement is true contradicts the assumption that the statement is false. Thus, the assumption that the statement was false must have been false. Thus, the statement is true."

7 0

3 years ago

Write two mixed numbers that are equal to 7.5

joja [24]

Seven and one half or seven and eight sixteenths

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers