Your equation
is in the form
The vertex only relies on "a" and "b" though, so that +9 doesn't really matter in this case. The vertex of a parabola is located where
So your x-coordinate is -1. You need to find f(-1) to find your y-coordinate, and then you list it in the form (-1, y).
No they wouldn't be the same because, the perimeter is adding all sides.
The square has 4 sides so you would add 9, four times.
9 + 9 + 9 + 9 = 36
And a pentagon has 5 sides so you would add 9, five times.
9 + 9 + 9 + 9 + 9 = 45
So, they are not the same.
Hope this helps. :)
Answer:
Tonya proof is correct
and Pearl proof is wrong
Step-by-step explanation:
AKL and GKB are obviously congruent. But the reasons given are different, One of the justification is Vertical Angles Theorem, and the other is Adjacent Angles.
But the correct justification is the Vertical Angles Theorem, because the angles are Vertically away from each other, or the angles are at opposite sides of each other. Which is when Vertical Angles Theorem is applied.
Making Tonya correct since that was the answer he given.
The definition of Adjacent Angles is incorrect, this Theorem is used when the angles are Adjacent to each other. When the angles are on the same line as the other angle, is when the definition of Adjacent Angles is applied. Not in this situation
Answer:No it's not an exponential equation in which f(x)is not qualified to an exponential number. no number from 1 - 20 can be used and get subtracted by 2 to give a square number.
eg-
4×2-2≠ square number
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
b
Step-by-step explanation:
