1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
natka813 [3]
3 years ago
7

ILL MARK BRAINLIEST----------------Consider the legacy of Napoleon. Was he mostly a hero or mostly a tyrant? How should history

view his reign? Write one to two paragraphs explaining your perspective on Napoleon. Support your claims with reasons and evidence.
History
1 answer:
S_A_V [24]3 years ago
5 0
Considering the legacy of Napoleon, he was a tyrant, but he was also dedicated. He conquered most of Europe in the early 19th century. <span>He sold Louisiana in 1803 to the United States for $15 million. In 1805, <span>Napoleon achieved one of his greatest victories at the Battle of Austerlitz, in which his army defeated the Austrians and Russians. </span>But hi</span>s throne came to an end when he tried to invade Russia, which went very badly, in 1812. One might say he achieved a lot while a tyrant, and that is correct. 
You might be interested in
Which U.S. president abandoned détente? Gerald Ford Jimmy Carter Ronald Reagan George H. W. Bush
tatyana61 [14]

Answer:

Ronald Reagan

I really hope this helped you out✨!

3 0
4 years ago
Which of the following choices best represents both President Abraham Lincoln and President Andrew Johnson’s main goals for Reco
Eduardwww [97]

Answer:

In 1865 President Andrew Johnson implemented a plan of Reconstruction that gave the white South a free hand in regulating the transition from slavery to freedom and offered no role to blacks in the politics of the South.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
What did the great Compromise and the three-fifths compromise involve so much debate and discussion at the constitutional conven
evablogger [386]

Answer:  Because each state was looking out for its personal interests in regard to representation in Congress.

Details:

The Great Compromise and the Three-Fifths Compromise both focused on  the representation of states in Congress.   Both of these compromises were devised during the United States Constitutional Convention in 1787.  

  • The Great Compromise resolved a dispute between small population states and large population states.  The large population states wanted representation in Congress to be based on a state's population size.  The smaller states feared this would lead to unchecked dominance by the big states; they wanted all states to receive the same amount of representation.  The Great Compromise created a bicameral (two-chamber) legislature.  Representation in the House of Representatives would be based on population.  In the Senate, all states would have the same amount of representation, by two Senators.
  • The Three-Fifths Compromise was a way of accounting (somewhat) for the population of slaves in states that permitted slavery.  For taxation and representation purposes, the question was whether slaves should count in the population figures.  (They were not considered voting citizens at that time.)   The Three-Fifths Compromise said that three out of every five slaves could be counted when determining a state's population size for determining how many seats that state would receive in the House of Representatives.
5 0
3 years ago
Which working condition was NOT prevalent in nineteenth century factories?
k0ka [10]

Answer:

high pay

Explanation:

back in 19th century factories noone was paid well

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did people move to specific towns
adelina 88 [10]

The correct answer is Option B) They United against Native American tribes.




Poeple moved to specific towns because they were united against the Native American tribes.



As the United States began to expand westwards, they encoursted lush landscapes with huge potential. However, all these places were already inhabited by numerous Native American tribes.



The government began to establish small towns in these places.



As more and more people heard about these prosperous areas, they began to converge and populate these towns.



The idea was to eventually drive the Native Americans out of their own land and use their abundant natural resources.



8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What was the purpose of the ganga action plan begun in the 1980's?
    13·1 answer
  • What significant event was hugely symbolic at the end of the cold war​
    11·1 answer
  • 14)Compared to market economies, command economies are more effective at advancing which economic goal?
    15·1 answer
  • What inventions transformed the textile industry?
    10·2 answers
  • A case appealed from a Georgia court of appeals would go to the'
    5·1 answer
  • Need help due today please help
    10·2 answers
  • What primarily motivated the United States and the Soviet Union to provide
    7·1 answer
  • 1. What led to the industrial revolution?
    8·1 answer
  • What should historians do? Check all that apply. 1. provide multiple perspectives on an event 2. include all of the facts availa
    5·2 answers
  • How did the constitution change america
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!