1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
prohojiy [21]
3 years ago
9

Which statement correctly explains the reasons that the Compromise of 1820 and the Compromise of 1850 were unsuccessful at solvi

ng the nation's issues?
Slave labor was such an important part of the American economy that most Northern states stopped opposing slavery.
Slave and abolitionist rebellions in Virginia and Kansas convinced most Americans that slavery was not worth fighting for.
Escaped slaves became voting citizens in the North and did not want their representatives to compromise with the South.
Congress could not control the states' desire to make their own laws, and dependence on slavery grew in the South while opposition to it grew in the North.
History
2 answers:
andrey2020 [161]3 years ago
5 0
<span>Slave and abolitionist rebellions in Virginia and Kansas convinced most Americans that slavery was not worth fighting for.</span>
kap26 [50]3 years ago
4 0

Slave and abolitionist rebellions in Virginia and Kansas convinced most Americans that slavery was not worth fighting for. The americans finally came to their senses lol...hope this helped

You might be interested in
which of the following conclusions do U.S. attitudes toward the panama canal during the 20th century support? A.historical conte
Strike441 [17]
C.  People's point of view can change to suit changes in historical context.

Allow me to add some explanation about historical context and how that works.

When the Panama Canal was built in the early 1900s, the historical and political context was one of imperialism. President Theodore Roosevelt of the United States used military pressure and warships to force Columbia to recognize Panama's independence, and then arranged with Panama to cede a strip of land to the United States (for $10 million) so that the US could build the canal and control the canal zone for commercial purposes.
By the late 20th century, the historical and political context was much different, and imperialistic control of overseas territories was no longer in vogue.  In 1977, US President Jimmy Carter signed a treaty with Panama which agreed to give over control of the canal to Panama by the end of the century, with transfer of control taking place on December 31, 1999.   
Part of the reason for willingness to make that transfer was that the Panama Canal had become expensive for the United States to maintain and operate -- so that part of the historical context plays in also.  Since Panama took over the canal, they have actually done very well financially with it.  You could check out a good book on the subject,<em> The Big Ditch</em>, by Noel Maurer and Carlos Yu, published by Princeton University Press in 2010.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
For what reasons did the united states forces enter mexico in the early 1900s
alexira [117]

There are two reasons one was to follow after Pancho Villa and 2nd was to start a revolt (someone already asked this question XD)

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
He indian civil rights act of 1968 recognized the legitimacy of local reservation law and guaranteed reservation residents the p
antoniya [11.8K]

We can actually deduce here there that Indian Civil Rights Act of 1968 recognized the legitimacy of local reservation law and guaranteed reservation residents the protections of the Bill of Rights.

<h3>What is The Indian Civil Rights Act of 1968?</h3>

The Indian Civil Rights Act of 1968 is actually known to be the law that actually recognises the Native American groups as citizens. It is a federal law. The Act actually granted Native American people the full access to the United States Bill of Rights.

We see here that Indian Civil Rights Act of 1968 actually guaranteed reservation residents the protections of the Bill of Rights.

Learn more about The Indian Civil Rights Act on brainly.com/question/7627008

#SPJ12

8 0
2 years ago
What did Executive Order 9981 do? a It forbade discrimination by gender in the armed forces. b It forbade discrimination by race
zhuklara [117]

Answer:

C. It forbade discrimination by race in defense industries.

Explanation:

Executive Order 9981 issued by President Harry S. Truman on July 26, 1948, abolished discrimination "on the basis of race, color, religion, or national origin" in the U.S. military. It led to the end of segregation in the military during the Korean War (1950-1953).

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which was an effect of the Protestant and catholic reformations
Gnoma [55]

The massive turmoil that the Reformation caused had a lasting impact on European politics. Soon after the Catholic Church deemed Martin Luther a “protestant,” Europe became divided along confessional, as well as territorial, lines. The religious turmoil of the period led to warfare within most states and between many.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following makes a true statement about the role of the United States in global human rights policy?
    13·2 answers
  • 3. Fill in the chart below to review the various battles of the Indian Wars.
    8·1 answer
  • The Bessemer process increased the amount of:
    14·1 answer
  • What’s the answer , I need it quick
    5·2 answers
  • Which of the following was a reason for communists victory in china
    14·1 answer
  • Why was the French government willing to sell the Louisiana Territory?
    10·2 answers
  • PLEASEE ANSWER RIGHT THIS IS A EXIT TICKET :(
    12·1 answer
  • Why do good people follow bad leaders?​
    12·2 answers
  • In Jewish tradition , the commandments were given to which leader on Mount Sinai ?
    8·1 answer
  • Who was considered to be the ""Father of Public Education?""
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!