PLEASEE ANSWER RIGHT THIS IS A EXIT TICKET :(

History

1 answer:

KengaRu [80]2 years ago

7 0

11. Representative Government.

12. Representative Government implies that the general population is able to choose and vote for a candidate that meets at least one party or all party's (impossible) demands, and works towards meeting those demands while in the seat.

13. Usually what happens is that the people vote the representative out the next election cycle. However, a recall can also occur, which is removing a representative rather <em>forcefully</em>, and replacing it. Enough signatures must be gathered from the voters in the district for this too happen.

14. People like representative governments, for it gives the people a voice in what their government should do for them, while not creating the havoc of a direct democracy, in which collecting votes and detailing may not be as quick and efficient. Instead, people representing the majority of likely voters of the state would instead push for a general agenda that he/she has promised to the people of their district.

You might be interested in

What did anti federalists fear would happen if the constitution became law?

Anon25 [30]

The Anti-Federalists feared that if the Constitution was ratified (became law) that it would give far too much power to the federal government over the states--leading to tyranny and the trampling of individual rights.

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What area in the US would be similar to the Fertile Crescent? Explain your answer. I NEED IT AS FAST AS POSSIBLE ITS DUE IN 2 HO

Nady [450]

Answer:

Its area covers what are now southern Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Jordan, Palestine, Israel, Egypt, and parts of Turkey and Iran. Two rivers, the Tigris and the Euphrates, regularly flooded the region, and the Nile River also runs through part of it.

Explanation:

i hope its right

7 0

3 years ago

Which does not describe a weakness in american society in the late 1800s?

Likurg_2 [28]

The answer is C
Few <span>entrepreneurs or innovators had ideas for new businesses or new ways of doing things.
I just took the test and it said this is the correct answer

</span>

7 0

3 years ago

Why were the natives in South Carolina called eastern woodland natives

lara31 [8.8K]

Answer:

The Eastern Woodland Native Americans were named so because they were forest dwellers. The culture, political systems and daily life of the Eastern Woodlands were affected by the geography of where they lived. Waterways, flora, and fauna were plentiful.

Explanation:

8 0

3 years ago

What do you think are the advantages and disadvantages of these methods of direct democracy: Initiative, Referendum, and Recall?

Marina86 [1]

In the United States, where there is no direct democracy at the federal level, more than half of the states (and many municipalities) allow citizens to vote on initiatives, and the vast majority of states have mechanisms to promote initiatives or referendums. There are also community meetings (town meetings) and various institutions at the municipal level where citizens can interact with those responsible for administration in decision-making. The disadvantages of the initiatives is that any citizen could present it at any time and it should be analyzed and taken into account, which could take a long time.

Referendums are elections in which voters do not elect representatives but participate in taking direct participation on some important issue of the country. As advantages, it is highlighted that the Referendum can be used to solve problems of a political nature, or the improvement of the governmental image, when it is too deteriorated in front of the popular collective. Another aspect that touches a possible disadvantage, has to do with the circumstance that can be used as a strategy or political weapon to satisfy political interests or ambitions of power. It has also been argued that this figure has a meaning called "zero sum", that is, where the majority wins everything and the minority loses everything, originating a tyranny of majorities, that have answered one or several questions about a specific issue and that in the case at hand, has to do with the end of the armed conflict, questions that are closed and must be answered with the yes or no.
Revocation of mandate, revocation of mandate or recall referendum (in English, recall election), is a procedure by which citizens can cease their public office to an elected official, before the end of their respective period, by direct vote or by collection of signatures, depending on the geographic or population dimensions. Those who propose a revocation mechanism argue that these have a disciplinary effect on elected officials, in which elected representatives will make fewer unpopular decisions if this may cause them to be more likely to be subject to a recall campaign. However, the same argument is also used against the recall: opponents argue that the recall completely undermines representative government as it causes elected officials fear to make unpopular but necessary decisions. Another argument in favor of direct democracy is that it provides voters with a continuous opportunity to make a democratic decision about who governs them, since they not only have the opportunity to elect the people who represent them every two to six years, but also to maintain a degree of control over the decision of its duration in the position. However, its opponents maintain that the mechanism of revocation could be used irresponsibly, and that this could be used by the political parties as a political weapon against the rival of the holders. The assertion that the revocation mechanism is being used as a political instrument was made by many Democrats against activists of Republican parties in connection with the recall in California in 2003.

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers