Answer:
18. 84 ft² or 18.85 ft² when rounded to the nearest tenth
Step-by-step explanation:
2πrh+2πr²
2× 3.14 × 1 × 2= 12.56
2 × 3.14 × 1² = 6.28
12.56 + 6.28 = 18.84
Have a great day :)
Answer:
Conclusion
There is no sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean of the home prices from Ascension parish is higher than the EBR mean
Step-by-step explanation:
From the question we are told that
The population mean for EBR is 
The sample mean for Ascension parish is 
The p-value is 
The level of significance is 
The null hypothesis is 
The alternative hypothesis is 
Here
is the population mean for Ascension parish
From the data given values we see that

So we fail to reject the null hypothesis
So we conclude that there is no sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean of the home prices from Ascension parish is higher than the EBR mean
Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The correct answer is Choice A) 367,274.
The chart for this data starts in the year 1960. We are looking for the population during year 2010. That is 50 years later.
To find the answer, just input 50 for t in the equation.
P(50) = 200(1.01223)^50