Answer:
C) Z is a substitute for input X in the production of Y.
Explanation:
Goods are substitutes if they can be used in place of each another. For example, pen and pencil can be considered as substitute.
If the price of a good decreases, the demand for that good increases and the demand for the subsituite falls. X and Z are substitutes
Complements are goods that are consumed together e.g. bread and butter.
Inputs are goods used in the production of output. If the price of input increases, the price of the output increases. Therefore, X is an input in the production of Y.
Since X and Z are substitutes, and X is an input for Y.
I hope my answer helps you
Answer:
<u>d. ensure that words are aligned with behaviors.</u>
Explanation:
Of course, we can argue that it is not all about expressing clearly the organization's culture in the mission statement or writing them on cards, pins, desk sets, etc which may not even make any difference among employees, neither is simply including the values in the employee recruitment process.
However, <em>what really matters is that the organization ensures all the words about the organization's culture on paper are aligned with the behaviors of employees as they carry out their assignments.</em>
For example, an organization that merely writes on paper that it doesn't tolerate discrimination in the workplace on the basis of race, gender, etc, <u>and yet still allows open discriminatory practices has failed to align words with behavior.</u>
The common arguments that are in favor of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) are:
Public image of the company.
Moral Justification.
Public Support for business.
Long run survival of the organization and the public both.
Common arguments that go against CSR are:
Ambiguity in business policies.
Moral Responsibility.
Shareholders' rights
Explanation:
Against
The public should perceive the company as their savior and not their enemy. CSR helps a company stay in the good books of the public. If a cigarette manufacturing company opens a profit free farm or a recreational park for the public, it will ensure the maintenance of a positive image.
Morally, when a company takes something from the public e.g their clean air, or clean environment, then morally the company is bound to give something in return e.g a water filtration plant.
CSR can lead the public to support the company during times of need. A company during tough times might get several volunteers if it is known to have given much to the public.
Co-dependence is essential for the survival of both the organization and the public. Companies excel if the public likes them. If a company has been known to have only take and never give, then the balance is disturbed.
Against:
Not every company has the resources or interest to focus on one problem. Therefore, ambiguous policies of different organizations lead to partial working on one social issue or environmental issue. it leads the problem to be partially solved and not completely eliminated.
Company might morally owe the public in some domain but might not have the resources to fix that particular problem. It may leave the company in a moral debt. In order to compensate, a company may go beyond its capabilities which will not result in mutual benefit. Only one party will be happy.
CSR activities require resources. A company has several stakeholders and all might nit agree to spending/donating their profits for CSR activities. This may sound 'selfish' but public doesn't always know what the stakeholders are going through. CSR in such a case may deprive a stakeholder from a fraction of his share of profit.
Answer:
b. Recovery paradox
Explanation:
Based on the scenario being described within the question it can be said that the florist is responding to the Service recovery paradox. This is a situation in which customers place companies on a higher pedestal after they solve a problem that the customer has had with their product or service. Which is what has happened in this scenario as the customers were extremely pleased with the company's service after they corrected the previous missed delivery.
Answer:
<em>C) Organizational plurality
</em>
Explanation:
Organizational plurality is a working environment in which all representatives are encouraged to collaborate in a way that promotes the gains for the company, clients and themselves.
As with the advertising agency, the employees are given chances to follow their decisions and maximize their experience.
