Answer:
d) redistributive taxation is unjust unless it remedies some past injustice
Explanation:
Rawls and Nozick were two American Philosophers, who took stand for inequality and injustice in U.S.
They both oppose the progressive system, which favors increase of tax as a share of the base size increases.
According to Rawls and Nozick, redistributive taxation should provide benefit to the people who have faced injustice in past through any mechanism such as schools, direct transfer, health care or other program that improve prospects of the poorest and injustice people.
Hence, the correct answer is d.
Second degree murder on police custody and then rub
<u>No</u><u> </u><u>criminal</u><u> </u><u>crime</u><u> </u><u>should</u><u> </u><u>not</u><u> </u><u>be</u><u> </u><u>heard</u><u> </u><u>judges</u><u> </u><u>other</u><u> </u><u>than</u><u> </u><u>professional</u><u> </u><u>and</u><u> </u><u>paid</u><u> </u><u>judges</u><u> </u><u>because</u><u> </u><u>they</u><u> </u><u>have</u><u> </u><u>a</u><u> </u><u>lot</u><u> </u><u>of</u><u> </u><u>experience</u><u> </u><u>about</u><u> </u><u>these</u><u> </u><u>kinds</u><u> </u><u>of</u><u> </u><u>cases</u>
Answer:
- The mugging of the police officer: purposeful
- The theft/disappearance of the fingerprints: knowing or negligent
- The arson: purposeful or reckless
Explanation:
Mens rea means "a guilty mind" as is required to prove a crime, along with actus reus (the criminal act). A purposeful mens rea means a crime was intentionally commited. A negligent mens rea is the failure to do what a reasonable person would do. A knowing mens rea means the potential result of a criminal act (such as lending a gun to someone who intends to shoot another person). A reckless mens rea increases risk to others, like driving under the influence.
Together, actus reus and mens rea form the corpus delicti or, both the criminal act and guilty mind.
