Answer:
The main way to make this argument is to say that it is exceedingly difficult for the government to determine what constitutes an unfair job. This is something that is beyond the ability of the government to judge.
It is one thing for the government to protect workers from things like unsafe jobs. It is much more possible to decide in an objective way what jobs are unsafe. We can look at things like workplace injuries and deaths and say that a job is unsafe. It is also clear that workers should not be subjected to unsafe conditions while at work.
By contrast, things are very much more difficult when it comes to the issue of fairness. There is no objective way to determine (for example) whether it is unfair for a fast food restaurant in New York City to pay its employees $8.00 per hour after they have been working there 2 or 3 years.
Because of such issues, it does not make sense for the government to protect workers from unfair jobs. It is simply impossible to determine what jobs are unfair when it comes to things like wages or opportunities for advancement. Therefore, (we can argue) the government should not try to make these decisions.
<span>The best answers for this question would be that he attacked Law, medicine and religion. Due to the injustice given to his son, he described how corrupt how these institutions are and that white men are considered a public enemy in the eyes of the people.</span>
The most important part of the enlightenment was the development of ideas through philosophers about new government. This was the most important part of the enlightenment because new ideas were spread quickly throughout Europe.
Answer:
THE COUNTRY SHOULD BE GOOD ENOUGH AND SET AN EXAMPLE FOR THE OTHER COUNTRIES..
THEN THEY WILL BE LIKE A LEADER FOR THE OTHER COUNTRIES
FOR QUESTION 2
Roosevelt described his style of foreign policy as "the exercise of intelligent forethought and of decisive action sufficiently far in advance of any likely crisis." As practiced by Roosevelt, big stick diplomacy had five components. First it was essential to possess serious military capability that would force the adversary to pay close attention. At the time that meant a world-class navy. Roosevelt never had a large army at his disposal. The other qualities were to act justly toward other nations, never to bluff, to strike only when prepared to strike hard, and the willingness to allow the adversary to save face in defeat.
The idea is negotiating peacefully but also having strength in case things go wrong. Simultaneously threatening with the "big stick", or the military, ties in heavily with the idea of Realpolitik, which implies a pursuit of political power that resembles Machiavellian ideals.It is comparable to gunboat diplomacy, as used in international politics by the powers.
Explanation:
HOPE I HELPED
PLS MARK BRAINLIEST
DESPERATELY TRYING TO LEVEL UP
✌ -ZYLYNN JADE ARDENNE
Declaration of the rights of man and of the citizen
