_____ is a defense mechanism that involves pushing threatening impulses out of conscious awareness.

Lawrence is watching a video in his psychology class that talks about how little albert was conditioned to fear a specific item.

KonstantinChe [14]

The source of Albert's fear was "A White Rat".

This was a famous experiment by John Watson and Rosalie Rayner for which they received much criticism. The child whose name was "Albert" but is famously known as "Little Albert" moved shortly after the experiment so it was a mystery what happened to him until recently when he was found as “<span>Douglas Merritte” who died before he was found.</span>

5 0

3 years ago

Ayudenme panas ;( Buscar información sobre la vida cotidiana de un esclavo en América de tal forma que logre comprender en qué c

ohaa [14]

Answer:

The living conditions of slaves in the antbellum American South, were some of the worst places for slaves across entire history.

*Living Conditions of Slaves: Housing *

Slaves were relocated in areas of the plantation for their living quarters. On some plantations the owners would provide the slaves with housing, on others the slaves had to build their own homes. Slaves that had to build their own houses tend to make them like the houses they had, had in Africa and they all had thatched roofs. Living conditions were cramped in with mostly as many as ten people sharing a hut.

*Living Conditions of Slaves; Food *

Sometimes they were given pans for cooking, but often they had to make their own food. The long hours they had to work in the fields meant that they had little free time for making things to improve their living conditions. Some slaves used a hollow out pumpkin shell to cook their food in.

Most plantation owners did not spend more money on food for their slaves than they had to and so the slaves lived on a diet of fatty meat and cornbread.

*Living Conditions of Slaves: Clothing *

Slaves would be given 1 pair of shoes and three items of underwear a year. (I don't know if this is true, so check up on that before you submit your "assignment" or whatever you need this for). Although these and other clothing would be provided by their owner, they were probably always the wrong size or shape for the person wearing it. ( made out of rough/loose materials in texture).

*Living Conditions of Slaves: Free Time *

Most slaves worked from sunrise to sunset. Some owners made their slaves work every day, others allowed slaves one day a month off and some allowed their slaves to have Sundays as a rest-day.

Slaves would spend their free time fixing their huts, making pots and pans and just chillin'. (also known as relaxing, xd). Some plantation owners allowed their slaves a tiny little plot area of land to grow things to supplement their diet.

Slaves weren't allowed to read or write, but some were allowed to go to church.

Explanation:

yeah just copy and paste, hope this helped. If not just send me a message and elaborate on what you would like me to explain.

8 0

3 years ago

Why is America's knowledge of the constitution so poor?

Furkat [3]

Answer:

Many Americans are poorly informed about basic constitutional provisions, according to a new national survey by the Annenberg Public Policy Center.

The annual Annenberg Constitution Day Civics Survey finds that:

More than half of Americans (53 percent) incorrectly think it is accurate to say that immigrants who are here illegally do not have any rights under the U.S. Constitution;

More than a third of those surveyed (37 percent) can’t name any of the rights guaranteed under the First Amendment;

Only a quarter of Americans (26 percent) can name all three branches of government.

“Protecting the rights guaranteed by the Constitution presupposes that we know what they are. The fact that many don’t is worrisome,” said Kathleen Hall Jamieson, director of the Annenberg Public Policy Center (APPC) of the University of Pennsylvania. “These results emphasize the need for high-quality civics education in the schools and for press reporting that underscores the existence of constitutional protections.”

Illegal immigration and constitutional rights

The APPC survey, conducted Aug. 9-13 among 1,013 adults in the United States, finds that 53 percent think that people who are here illegally do not have any rights under the Constitution. That incorrect belief is especially strong among self-identified political conservatives – 67 percent think it is accurate, compared with 48 percent of moderates and 46 percent of liberals.

[The civics survey drew attention from national and local media and many sides of the political spectrum. Read about the coverage here.]

In fact, immigrants who are in the United States illegally share some constitutional protections with U.S. citizens. More than a century ago, in Yick Wo v. Hopkins (1886), a case involving a Chinese immigrant, the Supreme Court ruled that non-citizens were entitled to due process rights under the 14th Amendment’s equal protection clause. Other cases have expanded upon those rights.* (For more on Yick Wo, see this video on Annenberg Classroom’s website.)

Most respondents, though not all, know that under the Constitution, U.S. citizens who are atheists or Muslim have the same rights as all other citizens. Seventy-nine percent of respondents know it is accurate to say that U.S. citizens who are atheists have the same rights as other citizens, and 76 percent know it is accurate to say that citizens who are Muslim have the same rights as other citizens.

What does the First Amendment say?

Nearly half of those surveyed (48 percent) say that freedom of speech is a right guaranteed by the First Amendment. But, unprompted, 37 percent could not name any First Amendment rights. And far fewer people could name the other First Amendment rights: 15 percent of respondents say freedom of religion; 14 percent say freedom of the press; 10 percent say the right of assembly; and only 3 percent say the right to petition the government.

The First Amendment reads:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Contrary to the First Amendment, 39 percent of Americans support allowing Congress to stop the news media from reporting on any issue of national security without government approval. That was essentially unchanged from last year. But the survey, which followed a year of attacks on the news media, found less opposition to prior restraint (49 percent) than in 2016 (55 percent).

Many don’t know the branches of government

Only 26 percent of respondents can name the three branches of government (executive, judicial, and legislative), the same result as last year. In the presence of controls, people who identified themselves as conservatives were significantly more likely to name all three branches correctly than liberals and moderates. The 26 percent total was down significantly from APPC’s first survey on this question, in 2011, when 38 percent could name all three.

In the current survey, 33 percent could not name any of the three branches, the same as in 2011.

The phone survey, conducted for APPC by the research firm SSRS, has a margin of error of ±3.7 percent. For more on t

7 0

3 years ago

How did China change after the death of its ruler Yong Le? pls help quickly lmbo

solniwko [45]

Answer:

1. The new rulers stopped all voyages.

2. Trade was limited.

3. China was separated from other civilizations.

Hopefully this helps!

Have a great day/night! ^^

5 0

3 years ago

Do you think countries should spend money in building arms and ammunitions or invest in the development of infrastructure? Comme

son4ous [18]

Undoubtedly, there needs to be a certain degree of arms proliferation in all countries in order to secure their borders from external or internal threats. However, when the military budget of countries like the USA, the world´s largest power, is far greater than the budget destined to meet other needs of the State, these latter ones are unavoidably neglected, to the detriment of the country´s people. On the other hand, if a greater budget is destined to the building of infrastructure, history shows —like in Japan and Germany— that the economy becomes less dependent on warfare and relies more on human capital and culture.

The question then becomes whether economic gain through arms proliferation is more advantageous to the welfare of the people or if the wellbeing of the people —through the building of infrastructure— is more beneficial to any given government. Since the wellbeing of the people is, in principle —based on the International Bill of Human Rights—, the aim of all countries, these should be more preoccupied with the building of infrastructure.

8 0

3 years ago