Answer:
<h3>The comparison and contrast of Davis and Moore’s functionalist perspective of social stratification with Mosca’s conflict perspective of social stratification lies on the concept of social position and power.</h3>
Explanation:
Davis and Moore's functionalist perspective of social stratification and Mosca’s conflict perspective of social stratification all emphasize on the presence of a power structure in a society which directly corresponds to the position of an individual. They all believed that society operates according to the social needs and that every individual performs their tasks accordingly.
The line of distinction between Davis and Moore's functionalist perspective and Mosca’s conflict perspective lies in the nature of men. Mosca believes that man is evil and dominating by nature and that compels him/her to misuse his position. He brings out the authority and power of the ruling class as an example to this argument. He argues that people in good position will eventually become more powerful as men are ambitious and selfish. They will gradually exploit people from lower position and use their power for their own personal gains.
While on the other hand, Davis and Moore argue that the greater the role of an individual is, the greater should be the reward. They illustrate the idea that people with bigger and greater roles should be given more importance because of their greater contributions to the society. Their perspective of social stratification emphasize that not everyone can perform the exclusive task of the doctors, therefore those who could perform such complicated tasks should be paid and rewarded more. Davis and Moore do not consider misuse of position and power by people of great influence.
In my opinion, Davis and Moore’s functionalist perspective of social stratification is more applicable and realistic. The fact that those who worked hard deserves a reward is a universal doctrine. These people spent a lot of effort and time before acquiring the position they are in today. Their effort and hard work should be rewarded greatly as they will contribute significantly to the society. Though, this perspective does not bring into account the chances of misuse of power and position, such elements can be controlled through efficient law and state control.
Answer:
B. Giving up
Explanation:
Giving up means not making further attempt in an event. It is a state of surrendering to challenges one is facing after standing up to it for a while. Such is the case of Adrian.
Answer:
The u.S. Constitution mandates that a census is taken every ten years for the purposes of deciding how many representatives should be elected from each state.
What came first was the Louisiana Purchase. Napoleon sold Louisiana to the United States
when he failed reestablish an extension of the Empire after getting it from
Spain. This gave the Americans more
territory and many Americans wanted to move west. After that was Missouri Compromise where the
balance between slave state and Free state was maintained. With the creation of the Kansas Nebraska Act,
the Missouri Compromise was nulled as an effect. This would later affect the Kansas elections
and later lead to Civil War.
Answer:
People also ask
What are the aims of the triangle of care?
The Triangle of Care describes a therapeutic relationship between the person with dementia (patient), staff member and carer that promotes safety, supports communication and sustains wellbeing.
