Answer:
Endorsing a presidential candidate is more likely to be done by a national party than a local party.
Explanation:
This is because when it's local, it's usually in support of local elected officials. It has nothing to do with national officials. However, when it is a national party, they could endorse a presidential candidate because that is ultimately more important and affects all people- hence the national. This is because whoever is chosen in such an important election changes the future of a country, and is something national organizations should deal with- not local ones.
Answer:
Buddhism i m not sure but maybe buddhism
The correct answer is B) the rise of partisanship in Congress.
The scrutiny of the nominated judges mirrors the rise of partisanship in Congress.
Many politicians and experts think that the scrutiny of the nominees to federal judges is important because of the level of responsibility they are going to have in their positions. So much has been discussed in this regard, including in the US Congress, where legislators have emphasized the importance of having exemplary judges in the Supreme Court that honor the principles of the judicial branch.
