1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Kazeer [188]
3 years ago
10

What were the effects of the Magna Carta on English government?

History
2 answers:
Debora [2.8K]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

It limited the power of the king.

It stated that individuals were equal.

It established due process.

It led to the creation of a legislative branch.

Explanation:

Kobotan [32]3 years ago
5 0
One of the effects of the Magna Carta on the English system and government was it was significant and was agreed, signed by the King that, himself, agree to have a limited power and give the people a trial by jury.
You might be interested in
What is an example of equilibrium?
Mamont248 [21]

Answer:

The answer to your question is Compromise of 1850

8 0
3 years ago
Define the word socialism, please!
Flauer [41]

Answer:

a political and economic theory of social organization which advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
N
Arturiano [62]

Answer:

A) Equality

Explanation:

Edge 2020

3 0
3 years ago
To benefit from colonialism, monarchs adopted mercantilism. Which of the following support this theory
hodyreva [135]
<span>Mercantilism was the concept that "all exploration and findings need to be routed back to the mother country for production and resale," and that "he who has the most controls the most." Monarchs at the time passed laws that required colonials to purchase their goods from companies chartered by the crown as a way of securing the profits.</span>
6 0
3 years ago
NEED TO BE ANSWERED ASAP!!! WILL MARK AS BRAINLIEST IF IT IS ANSWERED CORRECTLY
ale4655 [162]

Answer:

    The bombing of Hiroshima is and Nagaski is one of the most important events in history. Due to the fact that this affected and still is affecting human kind in Hiroshima and Nagaski. This all occurred because of Hiroshimas military and to the intend to make Japan surrender, in cause to end World War ll, they later decided to bomb Nagaski too. Over 200,000 died and thousands more were hurt in this tragity, but some surviors live to tell the story of this historic moment. Two of those surviors were Sunao Tsuboi and Shigemitsu Tanaka,  victims of the Hiroshima and Nagaski bombing on August 6, 1945 and August 9, of 1945.

   While Sunao Tsuboi was a 20 year old man heading to collage in Hiroshima  when this occurred, he was buned from head to toe he stated in NYTimes.com. He knew at this moment it would be the end for him, he layed next to a bridge. Until a classmate found and  approched him, he took him to a military hsopital where he got medical help. Till this day he is a retired worker, with a wife, children, and grandchildern. He has worked in office for the President and urged and stated this to the president to "work for world peace after he leave office".

  Shigemitsu Tanaka, was almost five when he witness this tragity. He discribed everything as white, windows braking, and a huge thunderclap in the sky. He was only playing under a tree when he took cover and tried to protect  himself. Later his mother suffered from repeated illnesses she worked as an elementary instructor. His father later died from cancer after 12 years of the bombing. Tanka said he "smelled burning flesh and moans", he also stated that Obama should clear nuclear wepons for good and hoped he would sit and listen to survivors.

   I would not defend nor support this tragity due to the fact that many innocent people were hurt or killed. In my opionion I think the United States should have used a diffrerent strategy to the point where no human being should have been hurt. Sometimes I do not understand why the United States didn't take percuation in this situation for the people. They always use the moto "For the good of the people" but did not lead up to this at the end. So in conculsion I DO NOT support or defend the bombing of Hiroshima or Nagaski.  

WRBSITES:https://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/28/world/asia/survivors-recount-horrors-of-hiroshima-and-nagasaki.html

Hope this somewhat helps you out, make sure to check for spelling errors many typos.

websites: https://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/28/world/asia/survivors-recount-horrors-of-hiroshima-and-nagasaki.htmlExplanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did Germany’s alliance with Austria affect the reaction to the assassination of Franz Ferdinand?
    5·1 answer
  • Which list describes the typical social stratification in the earliest human civilizations, in order of status?
    7·1 answer
  • Frederick douglass was a supporter for question 11 options: abolition national economy prohibition child labor
    10·2 answers
  • What was the spark that set off world war 1
    8·2 answers
  • Which parts of this painting show the Renaissance
    9·2 answers
  • The role of a campaign manager is to
    6·2 answers
  • If a drought struck a country, what would happen to the production possibilities curve of all farmers in the country?
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following organizations waged guerrilla warfare against Israel
    12·1 answer
  • How big is constitution??
    13·2 answers
  • What impact did the exploration by Europeans have on Australia and its culture?​
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!