1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Kamila [148]
3 years ago
13

Tyrone's management style could best be described as the "carrot or the stick" approach. If his subordinates perform to expectat

ions, he will reward them; if their performance falls short of expectations, he will punish them. Which leadership style does this describe
Social Studies
1 answer:
Rina8888 [55]3 years ago
8 0

Answer: This leadership style is best described as the TRANSACTIONAL LEADERSHIP STYLE.

Explanation: The transactional leadership style is best defined as a method of directing or leading in which the leader rewards good behavior and punishes bad behavior. Followers are motivated for only a short time in this method of leadership approach.

Like in the question above, Tyrone rewards his subordinates when they perform to expectations( rewarding good behavior) and punishes them when they fall short of expectation(punishing bad behavior).

You might be interested in
In Passage 1, Platt suggests that one way a society can reduce poverty is to
Sergeu [11.5K]

Answer:

provide in-demand technical training to citizens in need of marketable skills.

4 0
2 years ago
Raul goes to a psychotherapist because he is suffering from insomnia. The therapist asks him to relax by lying on a couch and en
inessss [21]

Answer:

Free association

Explanation:

Free association is the expression of the content of consciousness without censorship as an aid in gaining access to unconscious processes. The technique is used in psychoanalysis which was originally devised by Sigmund Freud out of the hypnotic method of his mentor and colleague, Josef Breuer. - Wikipedia

3 0
3 years ago
WAY 1. What level of government (local, state, or national) would best suits each category?
Klio2033 [76]

Answer:

For Way 1: <em>What level of government (local, state, or national</em>[*]<em>) would best suits each category?</em>

  • Immigration: National.
  • Education: State.
  • Environment: State.
  • Water Rights: Local/State.
  • Homeland Security: National
  • Unemployment: State.
  • Transportation Infrastructure: State/National.

For Way 2: <em>How does each level of govt. affect each policy category? This way may help you organize your thoughts more. </em>

<em />

Most of the issues should be handled by the state. Things like <em>immigration</em> and <em>homeland security</em> should be managed by the Federal Government because they effect the nation as a whole; while <em>water rights</em> should be managed either by the local municipal government or by the state. Things like <em>transportation infrastructure</em> should be maintained by the state, as you do pay taxes to the state government to maintain them. However, interstates are federal roads and should be maintained by either the state they lie in or federal government.

Explanation:

Immigration is a national issue. Immigrants can go wherever in the country they want, and that is why the Federal Government should handle this.

For me, education policies should be left to the states to decide. The Federal Government could set guidelines down as to what needs to be required generally, but otherwise, let that be an issue the states handle.

When it comes to environment, not everyone agrees how to handle this topic. I think it should be up to the states to decide how they are going to handle this issue. It would allow states like Washington and California that are supposedly "sticking up for the environment" to band together without Federal interference and it would allow states like Texas and Idaho to be free to do their own thing without Federal interference. The Federal Government should only step in  there are building cities being built on toxic waste dumps, should there be any toxic waste dumps.

On the topic of water rights, I do not know what you mean. Everyone has the right to clean water. And keeping that water clean and accessible should be handled by the local government. The state should step in if the local government isn't keeping the water clean and accessible.

Homeland security is a national issue that effects the nation as a whole and should be handled by the Federal Government.

Unemployment is a national issue, but I think the states should handle it. Every state (and city for that matter) can set its own minimum wage and local policies that can help businesses decide if they want to hire more or less people. For example,  if the local or state government sets the minimum wage to $20/hour but the business isn't making enough money to pay all of its employees (say it has 20 employees), it will either lay off/fire a number of those employees and avoid hiring more to allow it to pay the minimum wage, cut the time employees are working so they work less time and require less pay, or raise its prices. Of course, a small business likely wouldn't be able to raise its prices and probably can't afford to cut the time its employees are on staff. This means more people will be out of work, and prices will also be higher to pay for the wages for those still in the workforce. Like the environment, people differ on this topic and I think its best to keep the federal government out of this issue to ensure it gets handled the way the locals want it to.

Highways like US. Route 101 should be managed by the state, since they aren't as important to inter-state travel as the auspiciously named interstate system. However, interstates should be maintained by both/either the state or the Federal governments.

I take it the question is from a test, so I would guess you should also consult what the lessons or textbooks say about the topic. The question is worded in such a way that it is asking for your opinion, but I would suggest sticking as close to the course as possible for the sake of not getting a bad grade (or worse grade if you already have a bad grade).

7 0
3 years ago
Which nation was more at fault (Spain, France, and England)
Ilya [14]

England beacuse after I learnt and research, I knew that England was more at fault than Spain and France


8 0
3 years ago
50% of U.S. foreign aid goes to development and humanitarian assistance.  Which of the following would not fall into this catego
AnnyKZ [126]
Your answer would be B or D -hope that helped :)
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • The Ming Dynasty was followed by the _____ Dynasty.<br> Zicheng<br> Chin<br> Manchu<br> Qing
    12·2 answers
  • What was one particular goal that Andrew Jackson pursued during his presidency?
    5·2 answers
  • Which of the following is an accurate definition of absolute advantage as it relates to international trade? A. Having absolute
    11·2 answers
  • HELP ME PLZZ I NEED HELP
    12·1 answer
  • 27801
    8·2 answers
  • The bargaining power of buyers tends to be weaker when: Group of answer choices a) buyer demand is growing slowly or maybe even
    14·1 answer
  • Berns believes that good citizens demand that the law:
    11·2 answers
  • - Consider the following case study and ask yourself what position
    11·1 answer
  • When the U.S. invaded Afghanistan after the attacks of September 11, 2001, it relied on assistance from many of its allies in wh
    7·2 answers
  • What belief system is reflected in gu kaizhi, lady feng and the bear? travelers among mountains and streams?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!