Complete Question
The Brown's Ferry incident of 1975 focused national attention on the ever-present danger of fires breaking out in nuclear power plants. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has estimated that with present technology there will be on average, one fire for every 10 years for a reactor. Suppose that a certain state has two reactors on line in 2020 and they behave independently of one another. Assuming the incident of fires for individual reactors can be described by a Poisson distribution, what is the probability that by 2030 at least two fires will have occurred at these reactors?
Answer:
The value is 
Step-by-step explanation:
From the question we are told that
The rate at which fire breaks out every 10 years is
Generally the probability distribution function for Poisson distribution is mathematically represented as

Here x represent the number of state which is 2 i.e 
Generally the probability that by 2030 at least two fires will have occurred at these reactors is mathematically represented as

=> ![P(x_1 + x_2 \ge 2 ) = 1 - [P(x_1 + x_2 = 0 ) + P( x_1 + x_2 = 1 )]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=P%28x_1%20%2B%20x_2%20%5Cge%202%20%29%20%3D%20%201%20-%20%5BP%28x_1%20%2B%20x_2%20%3D%200%20%29%20%2B%20P%28%20x_1%20%2B%20x_2%20%3D%201%20%29%5D)
=> ![P(x_1 + x_2 \ge 2 ) = 1 - [ P(x_1 = 0 , x_2 = 0 ) + P( x_1 = 0 , x_2 = 1 ) + P(x_1 , x_2 = 0)]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=P%28x_1%20%2B%20x_2%20%5Cge%202%20%29%20%3D%20%201%20-%20%5B%20P%28x_1%20%20%3D%200%20%2C%20%20x_2%20%3D%200%20%29%20%2B%20P%28%20x_1%20%3D%200%20%2C%20x_2%20%3D%201%20%29%20%2B%20P%28x_1%20%2C%20x_2%20%3D%200%29%5D)
=> 
=> ![P(x_1 + x_2 \ge 2 ) = 1 - \{ [ \frac{1^0}{ 0! } * e^{-1}] * [[ \frac{1^0}{ 0! } * e^{-1}]] )+ ( [ \frac{1^1}{1! } * e^{-1}] * [[ \frac{1^1}{ 1! } * e^{-1}]] ) + ( [ \frac{1^1}{ 1! } * e^{-1}] * [[ \frac{1^0}{ 0! } * e^{-1}]]) \}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=P%28x_1%20%2B%20x_2%20%5Cge%202%20%29%20%3D%20%201%20-%20%5C%7B%20%5B%20%5Cfrac%7B1%5E0%7D%7B%200%21%20%7D%20%2A%20e%5E%7B-1%7D%5D%20%2A%20%5B%5B%20%5Cfrac%7B1%5E0%7D%7B%200%21%20%7D%20%2A%20e%5E%7B-1%7D%5D%5D%20%29%2B%20%28%20%5B%20%5Cfrac%7B1%5E1%7D%7B1%21%20%7D%20%2A%20e%5E%7B-1%7D%5D%20%2A%20%5B%5B%20%5Cfrac%7B1%5E1%7D%7B%201%21%20%7D%20%2A%20e%5E%7B-1%7D%5D%5D%20%29%20%2B%20%28%20%5B%20%5Cfrac%7B1%5E1%7D%7B%201%21%20%7D%20%2A%20e%5E%7B-1%7D%5D%20%2A%20%5B%5B%20%5Cfrac%7B1%5E0%7D%7B%200%21%20%7D%20%2A%20e%5E%7B-1%7D%5D%5D%29%20%5C%7D)
=> ![P(x_1 + x_2 \ge 2 )= 1- [[0.3678 * 0.3679] + [0.3678 * 0.3679] + [0.3678 * 0.3679] ]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=P%28x_1%20%2B%20x_2%20%5Cge%202%20%29%3D%201-%20%5B%5B0.3678%20%20%2A%200.3679%5D%20%2B%20%5B0.3678%20%20%2A%200.3679%5D%20%2B%20%5B0.3678%20%20%2A%200.3679%5D%20%20%5D)

To get a close estimate, we can round 49 up to 50 and 311 down to 300, obtaining an estimate of 50/300 = 1/6, or 0.1666... as a repeating decimal. That decimal approximation is a little less than one hundredth away from the actual decimal approximation of ≈ 0.1576
Answer:
slope = 0
Step-by-step explanation:
Calculate the slope m using the slope formula
m = (y₂ - y₁ ) / (x₂ - x₁ )
with (x₁, y₁ ) = (- 7, - 8) and (x₂, y₂ ) = (5, - 8)
m =
=
= 0
Answer:
Yes.
Step-by-step explanation:
Rational numbers can be represented as fractions with integers. The denominator must not equal 0.
is already in this form. This means that it's a rational number.
Hope this helps.
Answer:
Sure, Help you with what?
Step-by-step explanation:
Let me know :)
Have an AWESOME Friday <3