How far would you let the government go in examining people's private lives depends on the situation at hand. When it comes to sexual incidents and murder allegations, I think it's appropriate for states to share their crime databases. These are cases that the public should be aware of because it's not every time someone walks out or gets paroled for something and never commits that crime again.
As for other crimes, I see no reason to share this. It can cause problems for the person's self-development. I also think it crosses the line of abusing power to access this information. The concept of trading privacy for security makes sense when used for legitimate purposes, but it's always gone too far and distorts your view of what it means to trade privacy for security.
Know more about privacy here
brainly.com/question/1145825
#SPJ4
As she is Shannon is more schematic for extraversion, then she will answer more quickly than someone who is aschematic for the extraversion trait is asked to make judgment.
<h3>What is an extraversion trait?</h3>
The personality trait is present in an individual if he/she is always excited, social, talkative, assertive, emotional expressive etc.
However, if one with this trait is asked to make judgments about whether they are outgoing, they will answer more quickly than someone who is aschematic for the extraversion trait.
Read more about extraversion trait
<em>brainly.com/question/7375078</em>
The correct answer is which shows DNA replication is semi-conservative
Explanation:
Answer:
The world thinks americans are fat and lazy
Explanation: