"Mr. Fitzgerald is selling his home to permanently move into a retirement" He must be automatically dropped from the plan because he is relocating outside of the service region. He will be able to choose a new plan during a special election term. This is further explained below.
<h3>What is prescription drug plan?</h3>
Generally, Prescription drug plans (PDPs) are another name for Medicare Part D. These policies are available on their own from private insurance providers.
In conclusion, He must be automatically dropped from the plan because he is relocating outside of the service region. He will be able to choose a new plan during a special election term.
Read more about prescription drug plan
brainly.com/question/14176332
 #SPJ5
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
The correct option is "B" 
Explanation:
The burden substantial exchange limitation by The Argentine government cause to upset exchange and influences imports Due to prohibitive arrangement exchange it builds the expense of bringing in products and causing to diminish in supply in Argentinean advertise Before the exchange limitations, the market was working effectively, and was overwhelmed with imported merchandise because of the exchange limitations, import merchandise decays because of increment in cost.
 
        
                    
             
        
        
        
Answer:
A. 
brainliest if correct please!!!!!!
Explanation:
 
        
                    
             
        
        
        
Answer:
Disruptive innovation.
Explanation:
Disruptive innovation is one that creates the way a market operates, that is it creates a new market and disrupts the old one. Existing firms and products are displaced.
In this instance when Futura Inc. introduced an automobile that could run completely on electricity for longer periods of time than any other electronic or hybrid automobile, it introduced a product that will cause disruptions in the current automobile industry. 
Although there was challenges of frequent repairs, this was eventually resolved.
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
c. No; the facts of this situation do not provide reasonable grounds for a stop and search. Any attempt to do so by store security could result in a claim of false imprisonment.
Explanation:
According to the situation described in the question above, store security has no right to stop and search for Jeff. Therefore, the letter c is the most correct answer to this question.
Jeff's actions in the store do not provide sufficient reasons for there to be any kind of stop and research, as the facts in the situation do not provide enough information about an illegal act, so if store security forces a situation there could be legal damage to the store .
Therefore, it is essential that stores adopt a theft prevention strategy, with an effective security system and a team prepared to carry out correct approaches.