Answer:
Yes, it should be purchased
Explanation:
The computation is shown below;
Net present value = $9,000 ÷ 1.12 + $7,000 ÷ 1.12^2 + $5,000 ÷ 1.12^3 + $3,000 ÷ 1.12^4 - $14,000
= $5,081.53
As we can see that the net present value comes in positive so sigma should purchased the digger
Therefore the same would be considered and relevant
Answer:
this is a cost minimization problem, but it is missing some numbers, so I looked for similar questions (see attached PDF):
minimization equation = 20x₁ + 22x₂ + 18x₃ (costs per ton)
where:
x₁ = mine I
x₂ = mine II
x₃ = mine III
the constraints are:
4x₁ + 6x₂ + x₃ ≥ 54 (high grade ore)
4x₁ + 4x₂ + 6x₃ ≥ 65 (low grade ore)
x₁, x₂, x₃ ≤ 7 (only 7 days per week)
using solver, the optimal solution is
2x₁, 7x₂, and 5x₃
a. The number of days Mine I should operate = <u>2 days
</u>
b. The number of days Mine Il should operate = <u>7 days
</u>
c. The number of days Mine III should operate = <u>5 days
</u>
d. The total cost of the operation for next week = <u>$284,000</u>
Impact theory says that the moon formed from the dust produced by a collision between Earth and another large body.
Answer:
Net Income will be overstated
Explanation:
The journal entry for salaries payable is
Salaries Expense Dr.
To Cash A/C
(Being salaries paid recorded)
Salaries expense is charged to net income and the journal entry is
Net Income Dr.
To Salaries Payable
Salaries expense reduces net income as it being a deductible expenditure for a corporate.
In the given case, salary expense has been accounted as a product cost. This would reduce the expenses and thus would overstate the net income.
