Answer:
The correct answer is the option A: means that the firm's cost structure is not to low enough to allow it to attractively price its products and that its products are not sufficiently differentiated to create value for its target customer.
Explanation:
To begin with, the term called<em> ''stuck in the middle''</em> is known in the business world for the main reason of <em>being stuck in a situation where the costs of the firms are to high</em> to allow them to have competitive and attractive prices and and that also<em> these companies do no differentiate their product enough</em> in the way to generate value to the customer they want to reach and therefore it is said that these firms are stuck in the middle due to the fact that <u><em>they can not improve their benefits</em></u> because of their high cost structure and low differentation.
<h2>Answer : Option A) 1 foot/second</h2><h3>Explanation :</h3>
If we consider that the plates are placed 2 ft apart and there has to be 1800 meals that needs to be delivered in an hour.
so if we multiply 2 ft and 1800 meals that is delivered in 1 hour,we get 2 X 1800 = 3600 meals in an hour.
If we try to accommodate the plates at each ft then there will be 3600 meals delivered in 1 hour.
we know that 1 hour has 3600 seconds in it.
So, here the distance is 1 ft, and speed has to be determined time is 1 hour = 3600 seconds
3600 meals / 3600 seconds = 1 foot per second.
OR 1800 meals set at 2 ft apart in 3600 seconds will give the speed of the belt as 1 foot per second.
(1 ft = speed X 1 hour)
<h2>so, the speed also will be 1 foot per second. </h2>
Explanation:
Trade offs are something in which there are two things and we choose one of them according to our own preference or need. This is and should be our personal decision, but when Corporations and Governments decide on what to choose between two things, there would might be a negative impact on someone's life. He might feel controlled by the corporations and governments. For example, if corporations of CNG decides with the government that it is better for consumers to use CNG than Petrol in their cars, and lowers taxes on CNG and encourage consumers to shift towards CNG, then this trade off will have an impact of being controlled by the big giants. The choice should be of consumer's. The consumer should be the one who will trade off between things who are preferable for him.
Answer:
It's true I think if I'm wrong do tell me.
