Answer:
a. The process is capable of meeting design specifications because the index is greater than 1
Explanation:
Missing word <em>"a. the index is greater than 1.0, b. the process is not capable of meeting design specifications because the index is less than 1.0, c. the process is capable of meeting design specifications because the index is twice the process capability ratio, d. none of the above"</em>
Process capability ratio (Cp) = (USL - LSL) / 6σ
- USL = 5+0.05= 5.05
- LSL = 5 - 0.05 = 4.95
- Standard deviation σ = 0.01
Process capability ratio (Cp) = 5.05 - 4.95 / 6*0.01
Process capability ratio (Cp) = 0.1 / 0.06
Process capability ratio (Cp) = 1.666666666666667
Process capability ratio (Cp) = 1.67
Process capability ratio Cp > 1. So, the Process is capable of meeting design specification.
Answer:
a. undue influence.
Explanation:
Undue influence -
It the case , when the person is capable to persuade some other person's decision because of the link between the two parties , is known as undue influence .
In most of the case , one of the party is in power with respect to the other party , which can be due to more education , elevated status , emotional connections .
And , due to this advantage , the more powerful person uses this advantage .
Hence , from the question , Mona may rescind the contract due to undue influence .
Answer: Yes
Explanation: In the above case, a quasi-contract was formed. This is when a bilateral contract is not in place but one party will enjoy the benefit of the activities of the other party and may be enriched by it.
A bilateral agreement is the exchange of a promise for another and in this case would have been, the promise that Dozier would pay for Paschall’s work. This was not established, however, Dozier will benefit from Paschall’s work unduly if he does not pay for the improvements. The law holds that he has to pay for Paschall’s work to prevent being unjustly enriched.
