Answer:
it is invormation overload so true
Explanation:
Answer:
Of all the Impressionist artists, Renoir in particular changed his style in the 1880s. He came to believe that his work was too focused on the present time, meaning Paris in the 1880s. He worried that future viewers would not be interested in his art because it would become irrelevant. He therefore began painting subjects that were more "timeless," as opposed to scenes that were clearly set in present-day Paris. In contrast to his earlier works, like Le Moulin de la Galette, or other Impressionist works, like Manet's A Bar at the Folies-Bergere, Renoir's later works do not feature subjects that are so obviously late-19th century Parisians.
Explanation:
The Bathers is an excellent example of this shift in Renoir's works. The women are more classical in appearance. While they could be 19th century Parisian women on the banks of the Seine (the river that runs through Paris), since they are undressed they are difficult to place definitively in time. The painting has other features that are also indicative of a change in Renoir's style. The figures are rendered with much more detail; in contrast to Le Moulin de la Galette, it is clear that Renoir focused more on carefully painting the figures in The Bathers, rather than painting quickly as in the earlier work. Still, the background retains the Impressionist style of quick, rough brushstrokes, and the bright colors are also typical of Impressionist art. Although The Bathers shows a move away from the original tenets of Impressionism, it retains enough of the style to still be considered an Impressionist work.
Scholasticism was mainly promoted by the ideas of Thomas Aquinas. Aquinas, in turn, obtained most of his ideas from Aristotelian philosophy. Aquinas believed that Christianity could be rationally "proven" and that this could be done using the methods of reason, intellect and realism that were common in university environments, but that had rarely been used extensively within the Church. This approach gave great importance to philosophy, and attempted to reconcile this with faith.
On the other hand, Clairvaux was a proponent of mysticism. Mysticism focused on the spiritual matters of prayer, confession, forgiveness,and purpose. It also focused on personal development and on the pursuit of a life of sanctity.
I feel slightly more drawn towards scholasticism. I like the way it attempts to combine philosophy with religious thought. I also like the way in which reason and thought are included as part of a life of sanctity. However, I can see that scholasticism can have some problems when followed too closely. For a Christian, faith is important, and attempting to find a logical explanation for everything can diminish our faith, which should not question the wishes of God.
On the other hand, mysticism has certain strengths and weaknesses too. Its weaknesses can be found in the fact that mysticism focuses on the personal level. This might not be useful if we want establish general rules in the Church or want to focus on big questions. However, the advantage is that it allows for a very personal and unique experience for the individual.
Answer:
Count up.
Explanation:
So, lets say that the very bottom line was "re". You would count the line re, then the space mi, the line fa, and so on. Then you will find out which notes they are.
