Answer:
The answer is This should be possible in O(m+n) with BFS.
Explanation:
Give us a chance to take your chart G. Complete a BFS on the diagram. Check every one of the hubs in the diagrams as visited as normal with BFS. Rather than adding only hubs to the line in the DFS include hubs in addition to number of incoming ways. On the off chance that a hub that has been visited ought to be included disregard it. On the off chance that you discover a hub again which is as of now present in your line don't include it once more, rather include the checks together. Proliferate the depends on the line while including new hubs when you experience the last hub i.e the goal hub the number that is put away with it is the quantity of briefest ways in the diagram.
Answer:
Confirmation of accounts receivables is not required when the account information is immaterial.
An account is said to have immaterial information when the account doesn't reflect any important or relevant information that can affect the opinions or decisions of shareholders, potential investors or creditors of the company.
The auditors have the responsibility of deciding what information is relevant and important and what is immaterial
Answer:
Cost of The Land = $86,000 + $9,400 - $1,940 + $1,440 + $5,100
= $100,000
Therefore, Cost of The Land is $100,000.
Explanation:
cost of constructing the building = $86,000
cost of demolishing old warehouse = $9,400
cost of salvaged materials = $1,440
Additional expenditures:
Attorney's fee = $5,100
Architects's fee = $8,940
Driveways and parking lot fee = $15,200
Answer:
The description including its given issue is discussed in the following subsections on the explanation.
Explanation:
The opportunity cost asserts that whenever the quantity of a commodity falls, it's as though the earnings of that same purchaser including its good started going up. The substitution hypothesis notes because as the rate of a decent increase, buyers will replace the cheapest good with products that seem to be comparatively more costly.
Throughout the cases of common goods, the substitution effect becomes negative, meaning that even if the alternative price decreases, the market for the same commodity increases.
Income influence also becomes negative throughout the case of typical goods, i.e., unless the cost of healthy food declines, it implies the buying power Rises because.
If Package of Chewing Gum's price drops, the income as well as substitution result would be the following factors:
- Substitution effect: Chewing cost reduces the market for gum even though it is comparatively cheaper nowadays. Moreover, even though chewing gum, as well as a lollipop, become ideal replacements for one another and, it would provide that customer with the same benefit such that the reduction in price would lead to higher demand.
- Income effect: Benefit of income: reduction in Chewing price change would raise the customer's buying ability because for the same earnings, nowadays the customer will afford more.
Currently, the need for chewing would be increasing due to increased customer productive capacity.
Brian could drive safely to avoid accidents and traffic citations.
Those who can show that they pose less risk of loss generally benefit from lower insurance premiums. For example, an insurance company views those with an accident and traffic citation-free driving history to be lower risk. However, if a driver receives traffic citations and is involved in accidents, insurance companies often increase premiums to account for the increased risk of insuring that driver.