1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Zina [86]
3 years ago
15

About what percent of South Koreans are Christians?

Social Studies
2 answers:
Katyanochek1 [597]3 years ago
7 0
About 1% because they have different standards and lifestyles.
Levart [38]3 years ago
4 0
29% , South Korea doesn’t have major religious groups. Its population includes people with no religious affiliation 46% and significant shares of Christians 29% and Buddhists 23%
You might be interested in
Why was the Nile so important to the ancient egyptians
ArbitrLikvidat [17]
It helped to provide them with food and was very fertile for farming. It was also very helpful for transportation.
4 0
3 years ago
Suns core know as???????​
cestrela7 [59]

Answer:

The core of the Sun is home to billions and billions of atoms of hydrogen, the lightest element in the universe. The immense pressure and heat pushes these atoms so close to one another that they squish together to create new, heavier atoms. This is called nuclear fusion.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Technological improvements and reduced equipment costs have made converting solar energy directly into electricity far more cost
Natali [406]

Hello. This question is incomplete. The full question is:

"Technological improvements and reduced equipment costs have made converting solar energy directly into electricity far more cost-efficient in the last decade. However, the threshold of economic viability for solar power (that is, the price per barrel to which oil would have to rise in order for new solar power plants to be more economical than new oil-fired power plants) is unchanged at thirty-five dollars.  Which of the following, if true, does most to help explain why the increased cost-efficiency of solar power has not decreased its threshold of economic viability?

(A) The cost of oil has fallen dramatically.  (B) The reduction in the cost of solar-power equipment has occurred despite increased raw material costs for that equipment.  (C) Technological changes have increased the efficiency of oil-fired power plants.  (D) Most electricity is generated by coal-fired or nuclear, rather than oil-fired, power plants.  (E) When the price of oil increases, reserves of oil not previously worth exploiting become economically viable."

Answer:

(C) Technological changes have increased the efficiency of oil-fired power plants.

Explanation:

Economic viability is able to reveal the degree of acceptance of consumers in relation to a specific product. This viability is important to understand how the product will be received in the market and how profitable or not it can be for those who produce it.

Economic viability is usually greater when the cost and benefit ratio of the product or service is favorable, however this is not always the case.

Regarding the use of solar energy, although technological changes have made the installation and equipment of this type of energy more cost-effective, these technological changes have also increased the efficiency of oil plants. As a result, the economic viability of solar energy has declined.

4 0
3 years ago
Which of these principles is common to both Lamarck’s and Darwin’s theories of evolution? Species developed new features in orde
ahrayia [7]
The first one is the answer
4 0
3 years ago
Was justice served after the Holocaust?
weeeeeb [17]
It really depends on how you look at after the fight with Germany ended we were still fighting Japan but the U.S dropped 2 atomic bombs killing over 360,000 people they did it without telling the allies because they wanted to send a message to Russia basically saying that we have these types of weapons don’t mess with us basically a flex. After the bombs were dropped the war ended but I don’t believe justice was served because the U.S committed a war crime by dropping those bombs and they did it for research purposes because as soon as the war ended they sent over researchers to go collect data on what happened and how it effected the people. There is a lot more in depth stuff that will make my argument more strong but if I type all that out I will be here all day. Over all I don’t believe justice was served but that’s everyone’s own opinion.
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following is an example of cross-cultural ignorance?A. Thinking that relationship-building is a waste of timeB. Lea
    12·1 answer
  • Key issue 3: why do conflicts arise among ethnicities? pages 238-245
    8·1 answer
  • What was a long term consequences of the sharecropping system
    13·1 answer
  • How is performance different from learning?
    10·2 answers
  • Why national heritage is important​
    9·1 answer
  • Tate has been the subject of a study for nearly 20 years. A psychologist identified Tate as being extremely intelligent at a ver
    14·1 answer
  • Definition of stupas
    5·2 answers
  • 1What are three possible outcomes of a juvenile who commits a delinquent act?
    7·1 answer
  • How large was the Mongol empire under Kublai khan?
    12·1 answer
  • Pretend you are planning to open a new business in Nigeria. Write a letter to the Nigerian government requesting an investment.
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!