Excessive interrogations and crosschecking from other family members was required of immigrants processed at angel island but not those processed at Ellis island.
<h3><u>Explanation: </u></h3>
The immigrants at Ellis Island were treated more fairly as compared to those that tried to immigrate through Angel Island. The interrogations at Ellis Island were small which were preceded by a minute’s worth of physical checking and evaluation, which needed to be passed to move onto the part where the inspector checked their documents and cross-questioned lightly.
The whole process took way less than it took on Angel Island. At Angel island, the physical evaluation process was the same, but they had to go through a gruelling amount and difficulty of questions, after which they were verified from any family members that already lived in America. Through Angel Island, the whole process of immigration took about months of preparation in advance, and any difference in the testimony of the family members and the applicant led to excessive difficulty in the procedure and risked deportation as well.
The answer is superseding. An intervening cause will by and large clear the tortfeasor of obligation for the casualty's damage just if the occasion is esteemed a superseding cause. A superseding cause is an unforeseeable intervening cause. By differentiate, a predictable intervening cause commonly does not break the chain of causality, implying that the tortfeasor is as yet in charge of the casualty's damage—unless the occasion prompts an unforeseeable outcome.
Your question isn't formulated with enough information, but I'll try my best. Sensitivity levels is what I believe is the answer to this question. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
Answer:
It's egoist because it's imposed by an Almighty Power (God in this case), and even if you have the free will, one way or another, it's a condition to be good.
It's consequentialist because every choice you make, based on God's commandments, you will have a consequence, for the good or for the bad.
And finally, it's deontological because you are morally conditioned to choose, you don't have the option to put aside, it's a social convention to choose.
Explanation:
The Divine Command Theory address that everything that happens is based on the power and choice of an Almighty Power and humans are conditioned to choose. Even with the free will, the social and moral conditions demands a choice, that's why it's an egoist, consequentialist and deontological theory.
Answer:
Federalists
Explanation:
the feds believed in state power rather that a strong central govt.
