Answer:
The second one will be your answer
Explanation:
Oxygen
During aeroobic respiration oxigen reacts with sugar or glucose, producing carbon dioxide, water, and energy.
During anaerobic respiration when there is not enough oxygen, cells break down glucose into lactic acid and energy.
They can be observed in a microscope because both of them are very small to see. Mostly, they contain genetic material. Viruses need a host to keep it spreading or etc.
Answer:
Thoracic cavity
Explanation:
The definition for pleural cavity is: The space enclosed by the pleura, which is a thin layer of tissue that covers the lungs and lines the interior wall of the chest cavity.
Chest cavity or thoracic cavity is the space enclosed by the ribs, the vertebral column, sternum and is separated from the abdominal cavity (the body’s largest hollow space) by a muscular and membranous partition, the diaphragm.
Answer:
Although it is controversial topic, it is not a recommended practice among socienty to cultivate BT corn when alternative methods of increasing plant yield are already available. On the other hand, scientists are encouraging more research on genetically modified (GM) solutions with lesser/reduced impact on ecosystem.
Explanation:
Although, cultivating BT corn helps improving the yield, reduce insecticides usage, and enhance the grain quality, it has been extensively debated to reduce this practice globally. This is because of severals reasons. At first, cultivation of BT corn affects non-target organisms that interact with the plant for symbiotic or neutral reasons including pollination. Due to genetic modificaitons, BT corn produce BT-proteins that kills the non-target organism. Secondly, it increases the insect resistance and those insects which survives even after chewing plant tissues of BT-corn, they are found to have resistance against several toxins at high doses. Once these chemicals enters the food chain, they could be extremely toxic to other naturally growing organisms.
Prince Charles stated that use of GM plants is disaster and should be banned immediately. Likewise, he said that it is also impacting the climate change. On the other hand, Prof. Smith showed a contradictory opinion and said that the views of Prince Charles are saddening. He is seeing the one sided picture only. He should ask for extensive research rather discouraging this aspect of modern science.
In my opinion, I would also say that the technology should be improved and make more eco-friendly rather than complete abolishing especially when the apparent benefits are greater than the harmful effects.
