1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
strojnjashka [21]
3 years ago
14

Which of the following is true regarding the privileges and immunities clause of the U.S. Constitution?A. Under the clause, a st

ate cannot prohibit nonresidents from opening restaurants in the state.B. Under the clause, a state can allow state universities to charge higher tuition to out-of-state students because residents pay taxes that fund state universities, while out-of-state students do not.C. Under the clause, states may not discriminate against citizens of other states in the buying and selling of property.D. Under the clause, a state cannot prohibit nonresidents from opening restaurants in the state; a state can allow state universities to charge higher tuition to out-of-state students because residents pay taxes that fund state universities, while out-of-state students do not; and states may not discriminate against citizens of other states in the buying and selling of property.E. None of these. There is no privileges and immunities clause in the U.S. Constitution. The privileges and immunities clause is contained in a statute passed by Congress.
Law
1 answer:
Eduardwww [97]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

C. Under the clause, states may not discriminate against citizens of other states in the buying and selling of property.

Explanation:

The Privileges and Immunities clause is found in Article IV of the United States Constitution and it prevents the states to treat in a discriminatory manner to citizens of other states. It also does not contain a market participation exception so, when the State acts as a supplier like in the case of selling or buying properties according to this clause it is forbidden to discriminate non-residents.

I hope this answer helps you.

You might be interested in
Only answer if you feel like you know it
Monica [59]

Answer:

c

Explanation:

I think this is right its been so long since I did this test

7 0
3 years ago
According to your study unit, what is the main reason that improved human relations skills may improve your grades
klio [65]
If you are friends with someone and they know you too well and they are the one marking your script I’m not sure they will blatantly want you to fail
7 0
3 years ago
How do you think land use in the U.S. will change in the future?
zlopas [31]

Explanation:

The increasing population and urbanization have resulted into changes in the land use pattern. Large scale forests have been destructed to expand land for cultivation.

7 0
3 years ago
Which amendment prohibits excessive bail
aliya0001 [1]
The answer is 8th Amendment
5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Ozzy recently started working at a new company. He has been solicited several times to join the union of the company, but he wou
Ne4ueva [31]

Hello. This question is incomplete. The full question is:

Ozzy recently started working at a new company. He has been solicited several times to join the union of the company, but he would prefer not to. The union officials tell Ozzy that he won’t be allowed to keep working unless he joins the union. Which of the following is true?

-The union officials are pretending they have a closed shop and can't influence Ozzy's decision.  

-The union can't make Ozzy join the union, but it can require him to pay union dues.  

-Ozzy must now join the union because union shops are always legal.  

-Ozzy's requirement to join the union depends on his state of employment.

Answer:

-The union can't make Ozzy join the union, but it can require him to pay union dues.  

Explanation:

There is a law called the National Labor Relations Act that states that no employee should be required to be part of the union and that membership in the union should not be placed as a requirement for the occupation of a particular labor function. However, some states and some companies may adopt different approaches to their employees and the union.

 In some states in the country, although an employee is not required to become a member of a union, they allow an obligation for all employees to be required to pay at least part of the union's dues. In this case, we can say that in relation to the case shown in the question above, the union can't make Ozzy join the union, but it can require him to pay union dues.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Can a 14 year old have a fishing license in Kentucky
    10·2 answers
  • In the Katz vs United States case what is the constitutional issue involved in this case
    9·1 answer
  • How old are you?wwwwwwwwwwwddwddwwdwdwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwddddddddddddddddddddddddddddd
    12·2 answers
  • how does the supreme court use tests? what test does the court use when determining whether a state can use a confession obtaine
    14·1 answer
  • An arrow signal with a left-pointing arrow _____.
    13·1 answer
  • An increase in government spending with no change in taxes leads to a
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following takes place
    6·1 answer
  • Which of the following are major areas of interest in cognitive psychology?
    10·2 answers
  • Explain how the forms of demand supply will eliminate a market surplus
    11·1 answer
  • Who is the current chief justice of the united states supreme court?.
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!