The correct answer is B; They allow multiple law enforcement agencies to combine their intelligence, resources, and personnel to target a specific problem.
Further Explanation:
Task forces are put together and used by numerous local, state, and federal law enforcement agencies. There are many reasons this is done such as combining all the resources into one unit, having more personnel to work on the cases, and having more resources to get the cases solved. Task forces are put together for missing persons, murder cases, unsolved crimes, and drug cases.
When there is more than one jurisdiction involved the task force is more likely to be started. This is also beneficial for long term cases so that they don't have to work short staffed and have just the one case to focus on. Tasks forces will always have experts for different things so that the expertise is used to their advantage.
Learn more about task forces at brainly.com/question/12394318
#LearnwithBrainly
Answer:
Also referred to as a congressman or congresswoman, each representative is elected to a two-year term serving the people of a specific congressional district. Among other duties, representatives introduce bills and resolutions, offer amendments and serve on committees.
Explanation:
As he committed crimes that can be tried in State court, the last Texas Court to hear John's case is the <u>Texas Supreme Court. </u>
<h3>Which court is John's final court?</h3>
In every state there exists a judicial system that is similar to the federal system because there is a Supreme Court.
The state Supreme Court is the highest judicial court in a state which means that the final court for John in the state of Texas is the Texas Supreme Court.
Find out more on supreme courts at brainly.com/question/2324092.
Answer:
The attorney who renowned for his contributions was Clarence Darrow
Answer:
Fisher sued the University and argued that the use of race as a consideration in the admissions process violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The district court held that the University's admissions process was constitutional, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed.
