The difference is that compared companies Mussolini in Illinois
I would say c neolithic man / farmer
because in the neolithic era people went from hunting and gathering to farming
<span><span>A.</span>Feudalism</span>
In AD 1066, the Norman invasion of Britain overpowered the
Saxon-Dane rulers. They brought with them the feudal system of government or
feudalism. They establish the King of England. From then, England was changed
for ever. Normans spoke a variant of Frankish language or French and were known
to build castles everywhere, which served as the main form of defense. In the feudal
system of government, commoners worked and fought for nobles in exchange for
protection and the use of land.
Answer:
C.) While both the Ottoman Empire and Western European states relied heavily on forced conversions to expand and maintain their empires, the Ottoman Empire remained more religiously tolerant than the Western European empires.
Explanation:
I got this question right on the first try. Here's why I knew it was C. You would need to have some knowledge about the Ottoman Empire's role of religion. I don't know if it says in the passage, so if you do find it, then give me a heads up. Remember, how did the Ottoman Empire treat the minorities? Did they force persecution/conversion to Islam? Well, not really. Although they did develop the devshirme system, it was kinda of a force conversion because the children had to give up their Christian belief, but it was seen as an opportunity. They weren't punished, so answer A is not right. So they did practice religious tolerance. Also the Ottoman Empire tried to expand the empire to make it bigger as well. There wasn't any religious wars carried out the Ottoman Empire, and answer B does not make sense. Where in the passage does it say about those two empires having efforts of doing mass conversions. Look at Source 2. Sorry if this explanation is long, but I hope this helps :)
