Function is
.
<u>Step-by-step explanation:</u>
We have a function notation for the transformation that would change f(x) to have a vertical compression by a factor of
, reflection over the x axis, up 6 and right 2.
<u>Step 1:</u>
Vertical compression by a factor
, this means decreasing value of function by a factor of
. Function becomes
.
<u>Step 2:</u>
Reflection over x-axis means rotating f(x) by 180° over origin . Function now is
.
<u>Step 3:</u>
Up 6 , means value of function is increased by 6 , Function now is
.
<u>Step 4:</u>
Right 2, means shifting function to 2 units on right side i,e, on x-axis.
∴Function finally becomes,
which is
.
Answer:
True
Step-by-step explanation:
Type I and Type II are not independent of each other - as one increases, the other decreases.
However, increases in N cause both to decrease, since sampling error is reduced.
A small sample size might lead to frequent Type II errors, i.e. it could be that your (alternative) hypotheses are right, but because your sample is so small, you fail to reject the null even though you should.
The answer is 3 divided by 1/2
Answer:
$0.51 = 0.51 in decimal form
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
huh that's a wierd question its giving u