1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Charra [1.4K]
3 years ago
10

Valid arguments are said to be strong or weak?

Social Studies
1 answer:
Hatshy [7]3 years ago
7 0
Valid arguments would be strong. Valid meaning true or accurate. If an argument is valid, it is a strong argument. 
You might be interested in
The Dutch, whose political group was known as the Afrikaner National Party took over South Africa in the 1940s. In 1948 they est
coldgirl [10]

Answer:

Apartheid-

Explanation:

Apartheid- it is system that enforces as law during the year between 1948 till 1990 that illustrates the enforce racial discrimination law against the nonwhites.

It was introduced by the NATIONAL PARTY government. It focuses on the development of racial peoples all over South Africa. This system was introduced by white people against the non-white, the result of which is the eviction of non-white people from the house of white people

8 0
4 years ago
According to progressive reformers, especially crucial to the success of their causes were
OverLord2011 [107]
<span>According to progressive reformers, especially crucial to the success of their causes were trained experts.</span>
6 0
4 years ago
Can someone help me ASAP
Ede4ka [16]

Answer:

The three-day struggle of Gettysburg was the LARGEST battle of the Civil War

4 0
3 years ago
Which one is it? i have the same question
fomenos
Which question? please elaborate.
5 0
3 years ago
An informant may __________ without posing the threat of being unreliable. a. participate in a crime b. entrap people c. have a
Vlad1618 [11]

The correct answer is letter B

The informant is under no obligation to speak the truth, and the person is allowed to lie in his testimony.

Thus, the first difference is that the witness has an obligation to speak the truth. The informant does not have this duty.

The second difference is observed at the time of the judge to analyze the evidence obtained during the process.

6 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • To withdraw or drop out of a union
    11·1 answer
  • A psychologist who practices cognitive therapy might try to help a patient who suffers from a major depressive disorder by _____
    12·1 answer
  • The Annapolis Convention of 1786 failed to answer the needs of the nation because a. many delegates did not attend the conventio
    5·1 answer
  • Why did the us want to build the panama canal?
    6·1 answer
  • A researcher examines the physical attractiveness of a driver involved in an automobile accident (unattractive, average, or attr
    15·1 answer
  • What climate zone can be hot or cold but always dry high mountain tropical desert or temperate
    10·2 answers
  • How did wealth and trade help drive the Renaissance?​
    14·2 answers
  • Which of these describes an atoll?
    10·1 answer
  • Which of these was a belief of the Patriots?
    12·1 answer
  • HELP ! 43 POINTS why do you think owning property was important to rachel and her husband
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!